2002
DOI: 10.1556/jpc.15.2002.4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of OPLC and other chromatographic methods (TLC, HPLC, and GC) for in-process purity testing of nandrolone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, it does not need any tedious cleanup of the sample. The comparison of different chromatographic techniques such as TLC, as well as OPLC (over-pressured layer chromatography), methods in the purity control of nandrolone was reported by Bagocsi et al [16]. It was stated that thin-layer chromatography was not a selective method in this study, and the applied OPLC analysis required multiple development of chromatographic plates and the use of visualizing reagent in the form of sulfuric acid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, it does not need any tedious cleanup of the sample. The comparison of different chromatographic techniques such as TLC, as well as OPLC (over-pressured layer chromatography), methods in the purity control of nandrolone was reported by Bagocsi et al [16]. It was stated that thin-layer chromatography was not a selective method in this study, and the applied OPLC analysis required multiple development of chromatographic plates and the use of visualizing reagent in the form of sulfuric acid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…UV-Vis detection was performed at λ = 240 nm [6]. Our previous studies and the papers prepared by other researchers confirm also the utility of thin-layer chromatography (TLC) for the purpose of separation and quantitative analysis of various steroids, including selected anabolic-androgenic agents [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], because of its simplicity, low cost, and relatively low detection limit compared to other more modern chromatographic methods, such HPLC with different detection systems. Importantly, it does not need any tedious cleanup of the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The semi-quantitative OPLC method is an economical and fast limit test and can be used for in-process validation, where its accuracy is sufficient, but the rapidity of the analysis is important. The OPLC method developed has been applied for in-process purity testing of Nandrolone and has been compared with other chromatographic methods (TLC, HPLC and GC) ( Figure 7) [63].…”
Section: Overpressured Layer Chromatography (Oplc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Nandrolone, 2) 5α-4,5-Dihydronandrolone, 3) Nandrolone Δ 5(10) -isomer, 4) 8,14-Didehydronandrolone, 5) Dienolether, 6) 6β-Hydroxy-nandrolone, 7) Estradiol methylether. (Reproduced from Ref [63],. with permission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these factors, OPLC is eminently suitable for the separation of impurities and degradants in bulk drugs and their formulations. Examples for the application of OPLC to steroid hormone drugs are the purity test of norgestrel and levonorgestrel (visualization by fluorescence quenching at 254 nm, phosphomolybdic acid or sulfuric acid), 77 allylestrenol drug substance and tablet (sulfuric acid), 78 nandrolone (sulfuric acid; comparison of the impurity profile with those obtained by TLC, HPLC and GC), 79 norethisterone drug substance and tablet (sulfuric acid). 80 OPLC was successfully used in in-process-monitoring 81 and cleaning validation of equipment 82 in the course of the production of bulk steroids and steroid formulations.…”
Section: ·1 Planar Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%