2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-01614-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of operator- and computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy of particles from different atmospheric aerosol types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refrain from defining and grouping particles into rigid classes as many of the particles analyzed consist of aggregates of different particle types, precluding an accurate classification scheme based solely on the information obtained through CCSEM analysis. CCSEM can also be prone to classification errors that may be apparent during operator-controlled EM . SEM and TEM analyses indicate that there are several particle components which make up each BBA population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refrain from defining and grouping particles into rigid classes as many of the particles analyzed consist of aggregates of different particle types, precluding an accurate classification scheme based solely on the information obtained through CCSEM analysis. CCSEM can also be prone to classification errors that may be apparent during operator-controlled EM . SEM and TEM analyses indicate that there are several particle components which make up each BBA population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traces of volatile secondary particles were observed which probably originated from combustion sources. 30…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%