2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of old, professional and consumer model acoustic reflectometers in the detection of middle-ear fluid in children with recurrent acute otitis media or glue ear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Home screening of middle-ear fluid among otitis-prone children could be applicable in the future, if the results of this study can be later confirmed in the home setting. paper, the consumer model SG-AR and professional SG-AR performed equally well in the hands of otolaryngologists in detecting MEF among children [7]. However, to our knowledge no reports evaluating the diagnostic properties of the consumer model AR in the hands of laymen (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Home screening of middle-ear fluid among otitis-prone children could be applicable in the future, if the results of this study can be later confirmed in the home setting. paper, the consumer model SG-AR and professional SG-AR performed equally well in the hands of otolaryngologists in detecting MEF among children [7]. However, to our knowledge no reports evaluating the diagnostic properties of the consumer model AR in the hands of laymen (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In two previously published studies on home monitoring of children with AR, one used a professional model device and the parents were healthcare professionals [5], and the other concentrated on consumer usage issues such as technical success rate of AR recordings and persistence of results between consecutive recordings, but did not report any parameters of diagnostic performance [6]. When compared with results gained with the consumer model AR by otolaryngologists [7], diagnostic accuracy by parents in this study was similar but the error frequency higher (18% vs. 9%). This was expected, since physicians instinctively know in what direction to point the instrument and how to ''open'' the ear canal by retracting the ear lobe.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the size of the ear canal, the middle-ear pressure, the position of the TM, and the amount of MEE may all influence the spectral gradient curve making results debatable [ 52 , 53 ]. Finally, a supine position [ 54 ] and anesthesia [ 55 ] can significantly influence AR accuracy for MEE detection. Comparative studies have generally reported that the accuracy of AR for MEE detection is quite like that of PO and TP or, in some cases, PO and TP in validated hands are slightly more accurate [ 44 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Currently Used Methods To Diagnose Acute Otitis Media (Aom)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the first acoustic reflectometers in the early 1980s, 9 these devices have undergone major improvements and they now include a spectral gradient analysis. 10,11 Despite the potential advantages of spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SGAR) over tympanometry, 10,12 few studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of SGAR in the outpatient setting where the method would be of the greatest value. [13][14][15][16] In a prospective study of respiratory infections in children, we directly compared the performance of SGAR and tympanometry in unselected children seen in primary care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%