2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2012.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of O adsorption on Ni3Al (001), (011), and (111) surfaces through first-principles calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the possible highly symmetric adsorption sites 28 The adsorption energy of Na and K adsorbed on the surface of CaC 2 (110) is as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows the possible highly symmetric adsorption sites 28 The adsorption energy of Na and K adsorbed on the surface of CaC 2 (110) is as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the possible highly symmetric adsorption sites of Na or K atoms on the surface of CaC 2 (110), with a total of nine adsorption sites. Three of the sites on the top are the Ca on the top (T Ca ) and the C on the top (T C1 and T C2 ), two Ca–Ca bridge sites (B Ca1–Ca3 and B Ca1–Ca4 ), two Ca–C bridge sites (B Ca1–C1 and B Ca1–C2 ), and two triple Ca-2C hollow sites (H Ca2–2C and H Ca1–2C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Ni 3 Al(100) slab, our results show that after structural relaxation, the spacing change between the first and second Ni layers is −3.027% and that between the first Al and second Ni layers is −2.130%, which are similar to the previously calculated values of −2.859% and −2.466%, 24 while slightly different from the experimental value of −2.809% for the first and second Ni layers and a larger difference from the experimental value of 1.124% for the first Al and second Ni layers. 25 For the Ni 3 Al(110) slab, our results show that after structural relaxation, the spacing change between the first and second Ni layers is −11.261% and brween the first Al and second Ni layers is −9.992%, which are similar to the previously calculated values of −10.595% and −9.618%, 23 with a slight difference from the experimental values of −11.835% and −10.643%. 26 The percentage differences between the calculated and experimental values are probably due to the limited layers involved in the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni 3 Al has an ordered cubic (L1 2 ) structure with the space group Pm3̅ m. Our calculated bulk lattice constant obtained from the energy minimization of the bulk Ni 3 Al unit cell using a Monkhorst−Pack mesh of (15 × 15 × 15) is 3.568 Å, which is in good agreement with the experimental value of 3.57 Å 22 and with previous calculations. 23 The Ni 3 Al(100) and -(110) surfaces are constructed by cleaving supercells made from the bulk Ni 3 Al. Successive slabs with the (2 × 2) surface unit cell and five atomic layers are separated by a vacuum region of 15 Å.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation