2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy versus radiochemotherapy followed by resection for stage III (N2) NSCLC

Abstract: Objective: Comparison of prospectively treated patients with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy vs radiochemotherapy followed by resection for mediastinoscopically proven stage III N2 non-small cell lung cancer with respect to postoperative morbidity, pathological nodal downstaging, overall and disease-free survival, and site of recurrence. Methods: Eighty-two patients were enrolled between January 1994 to June 2003, 36 had cisplatin and doxetacel-based chemotherapy (group I) and 46 cisplatin-based radio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Induction chemo-radiotherapy may indeed be a prelude to significant morbidity and mortality [258][259][260], although recent evidence from institutional studies shows increased safety in adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy induction regimens [261][262][263][264]. A prospective randomised trial powered on postoperative morbidity and mortality is needed to compare chemotherapy versus chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery to clarify this issue.…”
Section: Risk Of Combined Induction Chemo-and Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction chemo-radiotherapy may indeed be a prelude to significant morbidity and mortality [258][259][260], although recent evidence from institutional studies shows increased safety in adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy induction regimens [261][262][263][264]. A prospective randomised trial powered on postoperative morbidity and mortality is needed to compare chemotherapy versus chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery to clarify this issue.…”
Section: Risk Of Combined Induction Chemo-and Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fowler [15] 8/13 (62%) 3/13 (23%) Deutsch [31] 3/16 (19%) 3/16 (19%) Macchiarini [52] 6/23 (28%) 2/23 (8.6%) Albain [8] 59/101 (58%) 8/101 (7.9%) Rice [53] 11/36 (31%) 4/36 (11%) Grunenwald [32] 7/29 (24%) 2/29 (7%) DeCamp [54] 30/105 (31%) 7/105 (6.6%) Stamatis [55] 180/392 (46%) 18/392 (4.6%) Semik [33] 50/130 (38%) 8/130 (6.2%) Intergroup 0139 [56] d 10/202 (5%) Pezzetta [28] d 2/46 (4%) Fujita [34] 54/124 (43.5%) 9/124 (7.3%) [13] d (7%) Roth [12] d (0%) Sugarbaker [24] 20/63 (31%) 2/63 (3.2%) Doddoli [25] 35/69 (51%) 6/69 (9%) Martin [17] 179 study, univariate analysis demonstrated that higher age (O70 years) and lower performance status (Karnofsky index !80%) adversely affected the incidence of mortality [47]. Recent reports by Brouchet and colleagues [48] and Cerfolio and colleagues [49] confirm the higher risk for developing major morbidity in elderly patients if they underwent neoadjuvant treatment before resection.…”
Section: Age and Gendermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are many retrospective studies reporting the treatment outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by subsequent resection in patients with stage III disease, [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and several prospective studies have been conducted to evaluate preoperative treatment, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery in those with stage III NSCLC. [21][22][23][24][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] However, the results are inconsistent, and conclusive evidence has yet to be obtained.…”
Section: Prospective Phase II Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%