2015
DOI: 10.1002/for.2370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Near Neighbour and Neural Network in Travel Forecasting

Abstract: In this paper we confirm the existence of nonlinear dynamics in a time series of airport arrivals. We subsequently propose alternative non-parametric forecasting techniques to be used in a travel forecasting problem, emphasizing the difference between the reconstruction and learning approach. We compare the results achieved in point prediction versus sign prediction. The reconstruction approach offers better results in sign prediction and the learning approach in point prediction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically it strengthens the assumption that a neural network model performs better than linear models when predicting nonlinear variables [10], [13], [24]. From the application perspective, SDNM based on PSR provides an effect alternative to learn the chaotic propensities of tourism time series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically it strengthens the assumption that a neural network model performs better than linear models when predicting nonlinear variables [10], [13], [24]. From the application perspective, SDNM based on PSR provides an effect alternative to learn the chaotic propensities of tourism time series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The most popular are the autoregressive integrated moving average models [3]- [5], the naive method [6], [7], and the exponential smoothing model [8]. However, the predictions obtained using these traditional models are usually imprecise, and it is difficult to utilize these models to approximate nonlinear and irregular tourism time series [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The training period is collected from Jan.2011 to Dec.2014 while the testing period is collected from Jan.2015 to Mar.2015 as shown in Table 1. Month 2011 2012 2013 2014 1 12401 62586 35716 51794 2 110312 51592 136561 115373 3 31318 46754 53621 71695 4 53930 77309 66218 88102 5 45641 58647 54503 93649 6 36966 51058 48664 69080 7 48496 62686 63016 89325 8 44389 61646 68931 104956 9 35402 55845 65295 81669 10 63650 88176 96656 133420 11 31823 49599 52369 77835 12 21671 33237 56710 49695 According to algorithm 3, the experiment selected = (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,<...>…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 2008 to 2016, the article on the topic of tourism prediction, most of the journals used artificial intelligence methods [2], grey model [3], ARMA model [4], Markov model [5], regression model [6], neural network model [7], support vector machine model [8], and only a few papers used hybrid forecasting model. Time series forecasting model is mainly based on historical tourist arrivals and the current tourist arrivals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%