2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-2133-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nanowire pellicles for plasma membrane enrichment: coating nanowires on cell

Abstract: A study is reported on the effect of nanowire density on the ease of pellicle formation and the enrichment of plasma membrane proteins for analysis by mass spectrometry. An optimized synthesis is reported for iron silicate nanowires with a narrow size range of 900 ±400 nm in length and 200 nm diameter. The nanowires were coated with Al 2 O 3 and used to form pellicles around suspended multiple myeloma cells, which acted as a model for cells recovered from tissue samples. Lighter alumina-coated silica nanowires… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples with low concentrations of both cells and NPs (Figure e and f) are typically the easiest to image at high resolution; , however, isolated individual areas of such samples (e.g., Figure S2b, SI) may not be representative of the whole and the low concentration of NPs may have limited their opportunity to interact with particular cells in each FOV (Figure f). Conversely, having a high concentration of NPs (or cells) in mixed samples increases the possibility of observing artifacts from both preparation and imaging procedures (Figure a–d). , While it obfuscates evidence of specific NP–cell interactions, coating of cells with a dense layer of NPs is successfully used, for example, in membrane-protein enrichment protocols, which are commonly illustrated with SEM images resembling our Figure a–c. A high concentration of NPs during incubation, therefore, provides a simple general method for ensuring that all the cells had the opportunity to interact with NPs before having been prepared for imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Samples with low concentrations of both cells and NPs (Figure e and f) are typically the easiest to image at high resolution; , however, isolated individual areas of such samples (e.g., Figure S2b, SI) may not be representative of the whole and the low concentration of NPs may have limited their opportunity to interact with particular cells in each FOV (Figure f). Conversely, having a high concentration of NPs (or cells) in mixed samples increases the possibility of observing artifacts from both preparation and imaging procedures (Figure a–d). , While it obfuscates evidence of specific NP–cell interactions, coating of cells with a dense layer of NPs is successfully used, for example, in membrane-protein enrichment protocols, which are commonly illustrated with SEM images resembling our Figure a–c. A high concentration of NPs during incubation, therefore, provides a simple general method for ensuring that all the cells had the opportunity to interact with NPs before having been prepared for imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The importance of ensuring that all the free NPs have been removed after co-incubation depends on the context of an experiment. For example, when verifying high loading of each cell with NPs, including NPs in a form of dense layers (Figure a and b) or aggregates (Figure d), even a relatively high fraction (perhaps, as high as 30%) of free NPs among all NPs sedimented with cells would not affect the interpretation of results dramatically. The salient common characteristic of such experiments is the relative unimportance of distinguishing between NP–NP and NP–cell interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation