2009
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nanohardness between coronal and radicular intertubular dentin

Abstract: ThisstudyinvestigatedthehardnessandYoung'smodulusofcoronalandradicularintertubulardentin.Tenbovineteeth were each divided into coronal and radicular groups, and the flat surfaces of the coronal and radicular dentin were subsequentlyprocessedalongthetoothaxis.ThehardnessandYoung'smodulusofthecoronalandradicularintertubular dentinwereevaluatedusingnanoindentationtests,attwolocationspertooth.MeanhardnessandYoung'smodulusvalues werestatisticallycomparedbyone-wayANOVAandFisher'sPLSDtest.Thehardnessofcoronalintertub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean hardness values of control dentine from this calculation were 0.49 and 0.52 GPa at both time points. These values are slightly lower than the untreated radicular dentine nanohardness values reported in previous studies, which ranged between 0.55-0.76 GPa [22,23]. Several factors could account for these differences including the immature nature of the dentine selected in this study, the location of dentine measured, and the technique used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The mean hardness values of control dentine from this calculation were 0.49 and 0.52 GPa at both time points. These values are slightly lower than the untreated radicular dentine nanohardness values reported in previous studies, which ranged between 0.55-0.76 GPa [22,23]. Several factors could account for these differences including the immature nature of the dentine selected in this study, the location of dentine measured, and the technique used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The exposed cross-sections were polished and then placed into ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Sonorex GT 120 Transistor, Bandelin Electronics, Germany) for 5 minutes to remove the smear layer [31], dehydrated with 70% ethanol, and stored in a desiccator for 24 hours. Afterwards, the samples were sputter-coated in a vacuum with a thin carbon layer (Vacuum Evaporator, Type JEE-SS, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Dentin Microstructure and Elemental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cervical third of the root there is a larger quantity of dentinal tubules than there is in the apical region, and tubule diameters diminish as they approach the apical region [33,34,17]. Studies conducted by Foxton et al [35] and Mallmann et al [36] affirmed that the bond in cervical and middle thirds is stronger than it is in apical third.…”
Section: In Vitro Study On the Influence Of The Light Polymerization mentioning
confidence: 74%