1971
DOI: 10.2508/chikusan.42.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of muscle growth between meat-type and egg-type chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (Table 1) confirm the earlier observations in several different strains of growing chickens (Moss et al, 1964;Mizuno and Hikami, 1971;MacDonald and Swick, 1981). The developmental decrease in the concentration of nucleic acids and the increase in the DNA-unit size have been observed in the skeletal muscles of other strains of chicken as well (Mizuno and Hikami, 1971;Knitzetova et al, 1972;Cornejo et al, 1980). Malhotra and Katoch (1978), however, reported a slight increase in muscle DNA concentration with age in White Leghorn chicks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results (Table 1) confirm the earlier observations in several different strains of growing chickens (Moss et al, 1964;Mizuno and Hikami, 1971;MacDonald and Swick, 1981). The developmental decrease in the concentration of nucleic acids and the increase in the DNA-unit size have been observed in the skeletal muscles of other strains of chicken as well (Mizuno and Hikami, 1971;Knitzetova et al, 1972;Cornejo et al, 1980). Malhotra and Katoch (1978), however, reported a slight increase in muscle DNA concentration with age in White Leghorn chicks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In very young chicks, no significant differences in total DNA or nuclei in a whole muscle exists between slow-growing and fast-growing strains (Moss et al, 1964;Mizuno and Hikami, 1971). As age advances, however, total DNA in fast-growing chicks increases at a faster rate (Table 1) than in slow-growing birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Selection for posthatching muscle growth results in an increase of the embryologically formed myo bre number and of both myo bre length and thickness during the posthatching period (Fowler et al, 1980;Anthony et al, 1988;Soike, 1995). Muscle weight shows close correlations to both myo bre number and size (Moss, 1968;Mizuno and Hikami, 1971;Allen et al, 1979). There are differences in the growth rate of the different bre types (Swatland, 1981;Iwamoto et al, 1993;Gille et al, 1998), but presumably none in the principal growth pattern (Gille et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%