2022
DOI: 10.3390/children9030410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MTA versus Biodentine in Apexification Procedure for Nonvital Immature First Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of Biodentine apical plugs compared to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating immature molars with apical lesions in children. Materials and Methods: Thirty immature roots of 24 permanent lower first molars with apical lesions were randomly divided into two groups: group 1 (15 roots) treated with MTA apical plugs and group 2 (15 roots) treated with Biodentine apical plugs. Treatment radiological outcomes were assessed using the periapica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of this study, no significant differences were observed among G1 (without SP), G3 (SP treated with MTA), and G4 (SP treated with bioceramic) (1083.73 N, 1025.20 N, and 1034.20 N, respectively), which meant that both MTA and bioceramic can similarly support and restore the correct structure of the tooth as if it was not affected by SP. Many laboratory and clinical studies have confirmed the role of MTA in supporting fragile dental structures and enhancing the survival of weakened teeth within the oral cavity during long follow-up periods, whether in treating immature teeth [ 25 ], perforations [ 21 ], or various absorptions [ 26 ]. Our current study corroborates this finding in SP treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of this study, no significant differences were observed among G1 (without SP), G3 (SP treated with MTA), and G4 (SP treated with bioceramic) (1083.73 N, 1025.20 N, and 1034.20 N, respectively), which meant that both MTA and bioceramic can similarly support and restore the correct structure of the tooth as if it was not affected by SP. Many laboratory and clinical studies have confirmed the role of MTA in supporting fragile dental structures and enhancing the survival of weakened teeth within the oral cavity during long follow-up periods, whether in treating immature teeth [ 25 ], perforations [ 21 ], or various absorptions [ 26 ]. Our current study corroborates this finding in SP treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PUI was adopted in the control group because this method is commonly and widely used as an IAS in laboratory, bacteriological, and clinical studies related to endodontics [45] [46] [47]. It was also mentioned that PUI can reduce the PP compared to conventional irrigation [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, they concluded that biodentin can be used as an apical plug to treat immature permanent molars with periapical lesions. It also showed favorable outcomes in terms of healing of the periapical area, which was comparable with MTA, and also that biodentin has decreased treatment time [ 21 ]. Before using MTA, Torabinejad and Chivian advise using calcium hydroxide for the first week to control bleeding from the periapical region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%