Comparison of modular and traditional UK housing construction: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>Housing completions in the UK have fallen to 125,000 annually, while government targets have risen to 300,000. This dramatic shortfall raises concerns as to whether current traditional construction approaches remain appropriate. This study aims to compare the traditional approach with modular construction, with a view to assessing whether a shift in construction systems offers the potential to alleviate the UK's domestic housing crisis.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>A comprehensive interpretivist review of the available relevant literature is undertaken on construction methods within the UK; advantages and disadvantages. A bibliometric analysis is conducted to extract trends and findings relevant to the comparison at hand. The database is Web of Science; the analysis software is the VOS viewer.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>The research illustrates that the UK housing market is in a state of crisis. A toxic combination of a rising UK population combined falling rates of housing delivery has resulted in an ever-widening housing supply gap. The construction industry’s capacity to meet this observed dearth in supply is further exacerbated by a number of chronic factors such as: falling participation in the construction sector workforce; lowering skill levels; reducing profitability; time to delivery pressures; and cost blow-outs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>While much information on the various construction methods are available, including comparative material, this study is the first to assemble the various comparative parameters regarding traditional and modular UK residential construction in one place. Thus, this study provides a definitive assessment of the relative advantages and disadvantages of these forms of construction.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector

“…The initial dataset of articles was extracted from Scopus (12 March 2021) using the pertinent keywords telework 'OR' teleworking 'OR' telecommute 'OR' telecommuting. Scopus was used because it is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive and complete journal databases available [104,105] and provides user-friendly analytical tools that are helpful to visualise voluminous extant literature [106]. As the manual literature review alluded to a generational trend for the progression of teleworking, manipulation of the sample was avoided, instead allowing VOSviewer to examine all publications for prevalence within the prevailing body of knowledge.…”

High-performance computing for computational modelling in built environment-related studies – a scientometric review

“…The scientometric approach gives a visual perspective of the structural and dynamic aspects of existing scientific researches, and also help in the identification of authors, countries, funding bodies, journals and types of collaborations that exist within a particular area of research (Blažun et al, 2015;Cobo et al, 2011). Based on its ability to give clear view of past happenings within a subject area, the scientometric review has continued to gain recognition in built-environment studies (Aghimien et al, 2019a;Darko et al, 2020;Nazir et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2019). The literature search was done using Scopus database on the premise that the database covers a considerably large number of published articles than its counterparts (Chadegani et al, 2013;Guz and Rushchitsky, 2009).…”

A Smart City Service Business Model: Focusing on Transportation Services

“…An example of building large-scale entrylevel houses is the use of the next-generation modular construction method [29,30], which involves stacking prefabricated standard spatial blocks (similar to Lego blocks). In addition to constructing buildings in a shorter period, it is also inexpensive [31]. Furthermore, smart homes and buildings which are the type of smart city services help to improve the quality of residential and work environments [32].…”