2022
DOI: 10.3390/polym14173546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Models to Predict Mechanical Properties of FR-AM Composites and a Fractographical Study

Abstract: Continuous fiber-reinforced additive manufacturing (cFRAM) composites improve the mechanical properties of polymer components. Given the recent interest in their mechanical performance and failure mechanisms, this work aims to describe the principal failure mechanisms and compare the prediction capabilities for the mechanical properties, stiffness constants, and strength of cFRAM using two distinct predictive models. This work presents experimental tensile tests of continuous carbon fiber AM composites varying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…made generalization difficult. Similar conclusions were drawn for the prediction of the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites using different ML algorithms [ 67 ]. Nonetheless, the differences in performance between the ANN and SVM models were relatively small, and both were successfully applied to predict the Young’s modulus of the hybrid nanocomposites developed herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…made generalization difficult. Similar conclusions were drawn for the prediction of the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites using different ML algorithms [ 67 ]. Nonetheless, the differences in performance between the ANN and SVM models were relatively small, and both were successfully applied to predict the Young’s modulus of the hybrid nanocomposites developed herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In structural models, the mechanical interaction of the microstructures of the filler and the matrix is simulated. This approach is called structural or micromechanical and has been actively developing recently [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties used for the analysis correspond to the combination of glass fiber and nylon (Tables 1 and 2) present in 3D printing. [23][24][25][26] Based on previous works, 27 the selected material stack configuration for the discrete model is symmetric, indicating that the orientation of fiber layers above the midplane mirrors those below. That aims to minimize the coupling effect described by matrix B in equations ( 4) and ( 5).…”
Section: Laminated Composite Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%