2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10020316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns

Abstract: Abstract:Grassland ecosystems worldwide are confronted with degradation. It is of great importance to understand long-term trajectory patterns of grassland vegetation by advanced analytical models. This study proposes a new approach called a binary logistic regression model with neighborhood interactions, or BLR-NIs, which is based on binary logistic regression (BLR), but fully considers the spatio-temporally localized spatial associations or characterization of neighborhood interactions (NIs) in the patterns … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SHAP values indicate that when sheep density decreases, the probability of grassland degradation increases. Overgrazing has been the dominant driver for grassland degradation on the Mongolian plateau before, which has changed the grassland ecosystem significantly towards lower grass coverage (Nkonya et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017). However, there is recent evidence that this causal relationship has changed.…”
Section: Shap Values and Drivers Of Grassland Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SHAP values indicate that when sheep density decreases, the probability of grassland degradation increases. Overgrazing has been the dominant driver for grassland degradation on the Mongolian plateau before, which has changed the grassland ecosystem significantly towards lower grass coverage (Nkonya et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017). However, there is recent evidence that this causal relationship has changed.…”
Section: Shap Values and Drivers Of Grassland Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCU was assessed for each year during the time window. The explanatory variables grazing and population were compiled from yearbooks, and the road network was extracted from Open Street Map (OSM) [26]. All resultant raster layers were resampled to 1 km × 1 km if they were not at that resolution.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In step 2, candidates that could not simultaneously satisfy the following two conditions lost their qualifications: (1) there must be a significant correlation of ∑ NDV I trajectories between x and the candidates; (2) the differential of mean value of the ∑ NDV I trajectory between x and candidates must be below 3δ. The 3δ method has been used to detect land cover change in some studies [14,56], and helped determine homogeneous spatial neighborhoods in this study. All of the candidates selected by this step constituted the homogeneous spatial neighborhood of x.…”
Section: Discriminating Human-induced Changes Using Optimized Restrendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complicated interaction between human and vegetation is critical for almost all of the research studies that have been done about earth system models [12]. Discriminating human-induced vegetation change has always been a challenging issue [1,13,14], even considering the long-term perspective of palaeoecology [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%