2014
DOI: 10.3382/japr.2013-00885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for the detection ofSalmonella in poultry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate assessment of the impact of in-feed preharvest interventions on the reduction of foodborne pathogens such as SE is complex and challenging due to a number of experimental and commercial considerations, particularly challenge dose and organism, administration or exposure routes (e.g., direct gavage, seeding models, and environmental seeding), production system type, sample type (e.g., feces, cloacal swab, ceca, and litter), animal age, temporal considerations, and laboratory analytical methodology (4,7,8,12,15,18,29,31,44). Challenge dose can influence colonization, concentrations, and transmission within various experimental models and subsequently the ability to detect and quantify Salmonella at various points in time from various sample types (7,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate assessment of the impact of in-feed preharvest interventions on the reduction of foodborne pathogens such as SE is complex and challenging due to a number of experimental and commercial considerations, particularly challenge dose and organism, administration or exposure routes (e.g., direct gavage, seeding models, and environmental seeding), production system type, sample type (e.g., feces, cloacal swab, ceca, and litter), animal age, temporal considerations, and laboratory analytical methodology (4,7,8,12,15,18,29,31,44). Challenge dose can influence colonization, concentrations, and transmission within various experimental models and subsequently the ability to detect and quantify Salmonella at various points in time from various sample types (7,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling of hens occurs monthly or during outbreaks. However, it is well documented that cloacal swabs are not direct indicators of colonization ( Langkabel et al, 2014 ; Battersby et al, 2017 ). Therefore, by using a “spot check” strategy that looks directly at the egg and the GIT of embryonic chicks is valuable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%