2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs)

Abstract: The precise prediction of changes in load flows, currents and voltage magnitudes due to changes in power is important for forecasting and managing grid congestions, voltage deviations and minimizing grid losses for example. This paper describes three different methods and further variants of those for state prediction and compares their approximations, neglects and quality of prediction. Since PTDFs and PFD modify the characteristics of the non-linear load flow equations by approximations and neglects, their q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy storage constraints 0Pm,tdisPm,tmax,$$ 0\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{dis}}\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ 0Pm,tchPm,tmax,$$ 0\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{ch}}\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ ηt=1TPm,tchgoodbreak−1ηt=1TPm,tdisgoodbreak=0,$$ \eta \sum \limits_{t=1}^T{P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{ch}}-\frac{1}{\eta}\sum \limits_{t=1}^T{P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{dis}}=0, $$ where Pm,tmax$$ {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}} $$ is the upper limit of charging and discharging power. Power flow security constraints 36 PlminPl,tPlmax,$$ {P}_l^{\mathrm{min}}\le {P}_{l,t}\le {P}_l^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ Plminh=1HGlhPh,tgoodbreak+w=1WGlwPw,trea,<...…”
Section: Unit Commitment Optimization Model Considering Wind Turbine ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy storage constraints 0Pm,tdisPm,tmax,$$ 0\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{dis}}\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ 0Pm,tchPm,tmax,$$ 0\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{ch}}\le {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ ηt=1TPm,tchgoodbreak−1ηt=1TPm,tdisgoodbreak=0,$$ \eta \sum \limits_{t=1}^T{P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{ch}}-\frac{1}{\eta}\sum \limits_{t=1}^T{P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{dis}}=0, $$ where Pm,tmax$$ {P}_{m,t}^{\mathrm{max}} $$ is the upper limit of charging and discharging power. Power flow security constraints 36 PlminPl,tPlmax,$$ {P}_l^{\mathrm{min}}\le {P}_{l,t}\le {P}_l^{\mathrm{max}}, $$ Plminh=1HGlhPh,tgoodbreak+w=1WGlwPw,trea,<...…”
Section: Unit Commitment Optimization Model Considering Wind Turbine ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slack node must be defined with a known voltage magnitude and angle [20] as otherwise the Jacobian matrix is not invertible.…”
Section: Electricity-gas Power Flow a Electric Power Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the nodal values are determined as relative to each other, an infinite number of solutions exists, leading to a Jacobian matrix which is mathematically singular [35]. To make the Jacobian matrix invertible a slack node is defined with a known voltage magnitude and angle and which also balances the EPS [35].…”
Section: A Electric Power Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%