2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for pre-processing, exosome isolation, and RNA extraction in unpasteurized bovine and human milk

Abstract: Milk is a highly complex, heterogeneous biological fluid that contains non-nutritive, bioactive extracellular vesicles called exosomes. Characterization of milk-derived exosomes (MDEs) is challenging due to the lack of standardized methods that are currently being used for milk pre-processing, storage, and exosome isolation. In this study, we tested: 1) three pre-processing methods to remove cream, fat, cellular debris, and casein proteins from bovine milk to determine whether pre-processing of whole milk prio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no easy solution to the question of which algorithm should be used to identify the best putative internal control genes regardless of sample variations [28,29]. It might also be considered that RNA stability and putative internal control genes expression stability may be changed or influenced by the sample collection, pre-processing procedure, method of RNA extraction, sample storage, and time [30,31]. Moreover, using artificial putative internal control genes such as 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA in milk sEVs for normalization in qRT-PCR is a questionable approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no easy solution to the question of which algorithm should be used to identify the best putative internal control genes regardless of sample variations [28,29]. It might also be considered that RNA stability and putative internal control genes expression stability may be changed or influenced by the sample collection, pre-processing procedure, method of RNA extraction, sample storage, and time [30,31]. Moreover, using artificial putative internal control genes such as 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA in milk sEVs for normalization in qRT-PCR is a questionable approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA yield was highest (45.46 ng/μL) using miRCURY Exosome Cell/Urine/ CSF method for sEV purification followed by miRNeasy Mini kits (Table 1). The RNA concentrations in bovine colostrum exosome was reported to be ranging from 0 to 100 ng/μL using different kits as reported by Wijenayake et al (2021). This combination was subsequently used for extracting sEV from 8 bovine colostrum samples with different IgG concentrations.…”
Section: Assessment Of Microrna Profiles In Small Extracellular Vesic...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Exosomes are now isolated and purified from cell cultures and bodily fluids using different methods [ 35 ]. However, the separated exosomes’ pureness varies, which is probably related to the contaminated particles, different sub-types of EVs, sample viscosity, and proteins of milk [ 36 ]. Furthermore, poor exosomal purity is because most existing separation methods fail to fully isolate exosomes from compounds that have identical biophysical characteristics, such as lipoproteins [ 35 ].…”
Section: Extracellular Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they may take part in protein expression and signaling cascades between cells [ 75 , 134 ]. In addition, these elements play an important part in the immune system’s development, inflammatory regulation, and cell proliferation and progression [ 36 , 48 ]. The exosomal mRNA of mice can be translated into proteins in human cells, for example, when human cells are treated with mouse exosomes [ 135 ].…”
Section: Extracellular Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%