2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
102
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLR also showed a slightly higher flux decline ratio compared with the FEn for all of the fouling resistance tests using dry milk, DTAB, and SDS. An additional fouling resistance test for which the FEn permeate flow rate was adjusted up to that of the FLR was conducted to further verify the effect of the permeate flow rate on the membrane fouling intensities [26,[40][41][42]. The operating pressure was carefully increased to match the permeate flow rate of the FEn to the FLR level.…”
Section: Laboratory Fouling Susceptibility Test and Pristine Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FLR also showed a slightly higher flux decline ratio compared with the FEn for all of the fouling resistance tests using dry milk, DTAB, and SDS. An additional fouling resistance test for which the FEn permeate flow rate was adjusted up to that of the FLR was conducted to further verify the effect of the permeate flow rate on the membrane fouling intensities [26,[40][41][42]. The operating pressure was carefully increased to match the permeate flow rate of the FEn to the FLR level.…”
Section: Laboratory Fouling Susceptibility Test and Pristine Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the selective permeation of water ions, the concentration of rejected soluble salts increases near the membrane surface. The increase in the solubility limit of sparing soluble salts results in deposition on the membrane surface, which further cause an increase in TMP (Pontié et al 2005;Shirazi et al 2010;Kucera 2014;Miller et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have also described this phenomenon [18][19][20][21][22]29,30]. Several studies have also shown constant flux operation increases the lifetime of the membrane and reduces the time for cleaning-in-place compared to constant trans-membrane pressure operation [31,32]. Nevertheless, constant flux operation is not practiced in the dairy industry.…”
Section: Constant Flux Operation For Charged Ultrafiltration Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%