2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8966(03)00135-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of maximal voluntary isometric contraction and hand-held dynamometry in measuring muscle strength of patients with progressive lower motor neuron syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with results from other neurologic conditions for lower-extremity muscles tested via HHD, where comparably high values have been reported for both same-day (r = 0.91-0.99, ICCs = 0.86-0.99) and between-session (ICCs = 0.90-0.98) test-retest reliability. 21,[27][28][29][30] High reliability of a similar lateral trunk flexion protocol has also previously been reported in people with spinal cord injury (ICCs = 0.86-0.99). 35 Comparable reliability has also been reported for the non-HHD assessments used in this study: the trunk flexion test has been shown to have high reliability in people with MS (ICC = 0.995), 38 needed to detect real change outside of the inherent variability of the tests.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with results from other neurologic conditions for lower-extremity muscles tested via HHD, where comparably high values have been reported for both same-day (r = 0.91-0.99, ICCs = 0.86-0.99) and between-session (ICCs = 0.90-0.98) test-retest reliability. 21,[27][28][29][30] High reliability of a similar lateral trunk flexion protocol has also previously been reported in people with spinal cord injury (ICCs = 0.86-0.99). 35 Comparable reliability has also been reported for the non-HHD assessments used in this study: the trunk flexion test has been shown to have high reliability in people with MS (ICC = 0.995), 38 needed to detect real change outside of the inherent variability of the tests.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Handheld dynamometry has been found to have high test-retest reliability in controls, [23][24][25][26] in elderly persons who fall, 27 and in other neurologic populations. 21,[28][29][30][31] In people with MS, test-retest reliability of HHD has been reported only for knee flexion and extension, where it has been shown to have acceptable reliability. 22 Test-retest reliability has not been investigated in the ankle, hip, or trunk in people with MS.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest achieved values during strength measurements obtained for each leg were summed to establish an overall strength score for a given muscle group. [29][30][31] Overall strength scores for the seven muscle groups were then added to derive a total lower-extremity muscle strength score expressed relative to body mass. This summative approach to quantifying muscle strength has been implemented in previous studies of strength and neurological impairment in the SCI population.…”
Section: Leg Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esses valores de coeficiente de correlação intraclasse são muito semelhantes aos de trabalhos que utilizaram diferentes dinamômetros para avaliar desempenho muscular em diferentes articulações e indivíduos (8)(9)(10) . Outro objetivo do trabalho foi analisar diretamente se os déficits coletados no equipamento DIM seriam semelhantes aos déficits encontrados no equipamento Biodex System 3 operando no modo isométrico e isocinético.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Uma alternativa a esse problema seria a utilização de testes isométricos que poderiam reproduzir os déficits encontrados em testes realizados em dinamômetros isocinéticos computadorizados. Vários autores utilizaram um modelo de dinamômetro isomé-trico portátil chamado Hand-Held dynamometry (8)(9)(10) . Esse equipamento é um dinamômetro manual digital que pode ser utilizado para mensurar torque isométrico em varias articulações realizando testes de força manual.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified