1992
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1992.30.8.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Markers of Coagulation Activation in Patients Under Oral Anticoagulation at Different Levels

Abstract: Summary:Three groups of patients receiving oral anticoagulation treatment were evaluated. The groups consisted of patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis (n = 60), patients after coronary bypass graft surgery (n = 60) and patients using oral anticoagulation after deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (n = 60).The patient groups were subdivided into three groups of 20 patients, each group receiving different levels of oral anticoagulation as indicated by the international normalized ratio (INR). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• TAT is a useful tool for the diagnosis of hypercoagulable states and for monitoring therapy in DIC, tumors, and high risk pregnancy 17,32 • TAT is a marker of still-present thrombin generation after thrombolysis in AMI [33][34][35] and a prognostic marker for reocclusion 36 • Fl + 2 is useful for diagnosis not only of hypercoagulable but also of hypocoagulable states 4,15 It can be used for monitoring of thrombin activity dur ing anticoagulant therapy with coumarins and hep arins [37][38][39] • Fl + 2 is, like TAT, a good parameter for monitoring therapy of DIC. 40…”
Section: Tat and F1 + 2 Are Markers Of Activation Of Coagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• TAT is a useful tool for the diagnosis of hypercoagulable states and for monitoring therapy in DIC, tumors, and high risk pregnancy 17,32 • TAT is a marker of still-present thrombin generation after thrombolysis in AMI [33][34][35] and a prognostic marker for reocclusion 36 • Fl + 2 is useful for diagnosis not only of hypercoagulable but also of hypocoagulable states 4,15 It can be used for monitoring of thrombin activity dur ing anticoagulant therapy with coumarins and hep arins [37][38][39] • Fl + 2 is, like TAT, a good parameter for monitoring therapy of DIC. 40…”
Section: Tat and F1 + 2 Are Markers Of Activation Of Coagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Van Wersch and colleagues have found a decrease in TAT with increasing INRs only in patients with mechanical heart valves, but did not find the same in patients anticoagulated for other indications at similar INRs. 22 The data presented demonstrate a reduction of antithrombin-enzyme complex levels of patients on oral anticoagulants, without a trend that is evident with degree of anticoagulation. Despite a lack of correlation with INR, ATM measures did correlate significantly with FPA in the INR >3.0 group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Firstly, full-dose warfarin was used up to the day prior to valvuloplasty in 10 out of 12 patients, resulting in a mean INR of 2.1 immediately before the valvuloplasty procedure. Given that this degree of INR prolongation is known to markedly suppress F1j2 levels [9,[16][17][18][19][20][21] and our previous report that even minor prolongation of the INR is associated with both lower venous and left atrial F1j2 levels and an attenuated leftatrial-venous F1j2 difference [5], it is surprising that Yamamoto et al [7] found not only peripheral venous levels of F1j2 in the range found in patients with a normal INR [4,16], but also a more than 2-fold difference between left atrial and peripheral venous F1j2 levels. Secondly, a comparison of femoral venous (0.85 nmol\l) and femoral artery (2.09 nmol\l) F1j2 levels in the study of Yamamoto et al [7] indicates that 50 % clearance of this coagulation marker occurred within its first passage across the lower limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that arterial F1j2 levels may be elevated in mitral stenosis has been presented as part of a brief report by Yamamoto et al [7], but the significance of this observation was limited by two factors. First, most patients were anticoagulated with warfarin, a drug which decreases coagulation activity [8,9], and it is thus unclear to what extent arterial F1j2 levels are altered in the presence of normal clotting times. Secondly, the presence of only 12 patients in the study group precluded comparison of arterial and venous F1j2 levels in the presence and absence of increased left atrial thrombin generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%