Comparison of Manual Compression Alone Versus With Hemostatic Patch in Achieving Hemostasis After Femoral Catheter Removal

Tjiong, Linda; Cyr, Alaina; Fox, Joan

doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2012.01.006

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the outcome of adverse effects (as reported by pain scores), we identified very low-certainty evidence (downgraded for serious risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision) from 2 in-hospital civilian cohort studies 176,177 of 224 patients undergoing endovascular procedures. There was no benefit associated with the use of hemostatic dressings plus direct pressure compared with direct pressure alone.…”

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations

Singletary¹,

Zideman²,

Bendall³

et al. 2020

Resuscitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science WithTreatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life-threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, hemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research.The 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) is the fourth in a series of annual summary publications from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This 2020 CoSTR for first aid includes new topics addressed by systematic reviews performed within the past 12 months. It also includes updates of the first aid treatment recommendations published from 2010 through 2019 that are based on additional evidence evaluations and updates.As a result, this 2020 CoSTR for first aid represents the most comprehensive update since 2010.

show abstract

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…There was no benefit associated with the use of hemostatic dressings plus direct pressure compared with direct pressure alone. One study 176 reported no significant differences in pain scores between the use of hemostatic dressing and the use of direct pressure.…”

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations

Singletary¹,

Zideman²,

Bendall³

et al. 2020

Resuscitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the above hemostatic agents are often ineffective in handling bleeding from the surface of vulnerable visceral tissues during surgery, such as the liver with its thin capsule, brittle tissue, and abundant capillaries, because excessive compression may cause secondary injury. − Furthermore, the heavy pressing during the hemostasis process with the above hemostatic agents can cause extreme secondary pain to the patients. − Therefore, designing a nonpressing hemostat that shows rapid hemostasis performance and that can reduce patient pain is still an urgent need.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multifunctional Tissue-Adhesive Cryogel Wound Dressing for Rapid Nonpressing Surface Hemorrhage and Wound Repair

Zhang

Liang

et al. 2020

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

286

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cryogels with tissue adhesion have great potential as wound dressings for rapid hemostasis for uncontrollable nonpressing surface hemorrhage and wound healing, but their use has not been reported previously. Herein, we designed a series of antibacterial and antioxidant tissue-adhesive cryogels based on quaternized chitosan (QCS) and polydopamine (PDA). These cryogels had good blood cell and platelet adhesion, enrichment, and activation properties for rapid nonpressing surface hemostasis and wound healing. The cryogels exhibited outstanding mechanical strength and easy removability, antioxidant activity, and NIR photothermal-enhanced antibacterial performance. The cryogels showed much better hemostasis than gauze and gelatin sponge in a standardized strip rat liver injury model, a standardized circular rabbit liver section model, and a pig skin laceration model. Furthermore, the excellent hemostatic performance of the QCS/ PDA2.0 cryogel (containing 20 mg/mL QCS and 2.0 mg/mL PDA) for coagulopathic hemorrhages was confirmed in a standardized coagulation disorder rabbit circular liver section model. In addition, the QCS/PDA2.0 cryogel promoted rapid hemostasis in a deep noncompressible wound and a much better wound healing effect than a chitosan sponge and Tegaderm film in a full-thickness skin defect model. Overall, these multifunctional tissue-adhesive cryogels with excellent hemostatic performance and enhanced wound healing properties are suitable candidates for tissue-adhesive hemostat and wound healing dressings.

show abstract

Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Dahal

Rijal

Shahukhal

et al. 2018

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Manual Compression Alone Versus With Hemostatic Patch in Achieving Hemostasis After Femoral Catheter Removal

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations

Multifunctional Tissue-Adhesive Cryogel Wound Dressing for Rapid Nonpressing Surface Hemorrhage and Wound Repair

Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About