2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of magnetic resonance urography to dimercaptosuccinic acid scan for the identification of renal parenchyma defects in children with vesicoureteral reflux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mindful of the potential higher sensitivity to radiation, imaging could alternatively be carried out using MR (Supplemental Figure 3). Although there is no published experience specifically in FA, MR-urography has been used by us and others for reflux and assessment of renal function, avoiding ionizing radiation exposure [16, 17]. In our cohort, renal impairment at diagnosis was seen in children with severe phenotype including early severe haematological complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Mindful of the potential higher sensitivity to radiation, imaging could alternatively be carried out using MR (Supplemental Figure 3). Although there is no published experience specifically in FA, MR-urography has been used by us and others for reflux and assessment of renal function, avoiding ionizing radiation exposure [16, 17]. In our cohort, renal impairment at diagnosis was seen in children with severe phenotype including early severe haematological complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…MRU combines high spatial resolution with assessment of renal function and drainage. Several studies comparing MRU to DMSA renal scintigraphy for the detection of pyelonephritis and renal scarring have shown MRU to be at least equivalent or superior to DMSA renal scintigraphy [27][28][29]. MRU can distinguish among acute pyelonephritis, renal scarring, and renal dysplasia [30].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Sattari et al [39] suggests that CT is more accurate than DMSA renal scintigraphy in detecting involvement with acute pyelonephritis in adult patients. Cerwinka et al [28] found MRU to be superior to DMSA renal scintigraphy in the identification of renal scarring in children with vesicoureteral reflux and a history of pyelonephritis; furthermore, DMSA renal scintigraphy also appears to underestimate the degree of renal parenchymal damage. Other studies comparing MRU to DMSA renal scintigraphy for the detection of pyelonephritis and renal scarring have shown MRU to be at least equivalent or superior to DMSA renal scintigraphy [27,29].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, MRI may be even superior to DMSA in detecting renal scars due to its high spatial and contrast resolution. It offers a higher specificity in the differentiation among the possible causes of photopenic DMSA defects …”
Section: Imaging Techniques In Renal Transplant Follow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%