2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3129850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Traffic Prediction of Real Wireless Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each tree selects a particular prediction and the random forest then averages the different predictions provided by the decision trees, which improves prediction accuracy. The random forest has been studied extensively in the literature (see [52][53][54][55]). Its architecture is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each tree selects a particular prediction and the random forest then averages the different predictions provided by the decision trees, which improves prediction accuracy. The random forest has been studied extensively in the literature (see [52][53][54][55]). Its architecture is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, vehicular networks are in the early stages of challenges related to the exploitation and adaptation of AI tools [6]. Moreover, the implementation of Machine Learning (ML) techniques as a subset of AI could optimize the operation of the networks in predicting failure before it causes a significant reduction in the Quality of Service (QoS) [7]. In VANETs, information about road conditions and other vehicles will be exchanged among communications when the number of sending and receiving packets through these communications increases (i.e., many vehicular users on the road) and traffic occurs in the network, which will cause a delay or decline in important services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered our problem as a classification task. Furthermore, supervised ML algorithms, including Random Forest(RF), K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree(DT) and Support Vector Machines (SVM), are commonly considered for designing predictive models in traffic [7]. Among them, Support Vector Machines (SVM), which can adapt to the dynamic and nonlinear nature of traffic data, have problems with selecting the kernel type and resolving this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, UL is applied when it is impossible or extremely difficult to obtain labeled samples [16]. The goal is to model the latent or underlying structure of the distribution in the data, e.g., by Clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%