2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3232469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Applicability of Imagery-Based CNN to Computational Offloading Location Selection

Abstract: The progress in computational offloading is heavily pushing the development of the modern Information and Communications Technology domain. The growth in resource-constrained Internet of Things devices demands the development of new computational offloading strategies to be sustainably integrated in beyond 5G networks. One of the solutions to said demand is enabling Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) powered by advanced methods of Machine Learning (ML). This paper proposes the application of ML-powered computational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following its development, the model was subjected to rigorous testing on test datasets to ascertain its efficacy and generalizability. We evaluated the model's performance using the following metrics: mean absolute error (MAE) root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ), as defined in Equations ( 8)-( 10) [45,46]. These metrics were helpful in comparing our model with others so as to verify its performance and gain insights into its strength and weakness in the context of flight fare analysis.…”
Section: Gru Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following its development, the model was subjected to rigorous testing on test datasets to ascertain its efficacy and generalizability. We evaluated the model's performance using the following metrics: mean absolute error (MAE) root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ), as defined in Equations ( 8)-( 10) [45,46]. These metrics were helpful in comparing our model with others so as to verify its performance and gain insights into its strength and weakness in the context of flight fare analysis.…”
Section: Gru Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These evaluation metrics play a vital role in comparing and contrasting the performance of different variations of the stacked GRU-LSTM model, allowing for the identification of the model that proves superior performance. These performance evaluation metrics, MSE, MAE, and RMSE, are computed in Equations ( 2)-( 4) [32], respectively, as follows:…”
Section: The Proposed Stacked Gru-lstm Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of improvement heuristics algorithms include the GA [34], ACO [35], and PSO [36], [37]. Some scholars have also applied various optimization methods in machine learning to solve TSP and have made progress [38], [39], [40]. Based on the literature mentioned above, the proposed approach in this research aims to address the problem of location priority in TSP by employing fuzzy inference systems combined with metaheuristic algorithms such as the Greedy Algorithm, Dynamic Programming, and Genetic Algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%