Comparison of lumbopelvic and dynamic stability between dancers and non-dancers

Paris‐Alemany, Alba; Torres-Palomino, Alba; Marino, Lilya; Calvo‐Lobo, César; Gadea‐Mateos, Luis

doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.06.010

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The considered criteria for study exclusion were congenital modifications of the lumbopelvic region, rheumatic disorders, neuromuscular pathologies, body mass index (BMI) greater than 31 kg/m 2 , respiratory conditions, neurological alterations, history of surgery, lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions (i.e., fractures, chronic ankle instability or sprains), skin conditions and inability to perform the study procedure. Lastly, reductions in physical activity or rest periods for more than 4 weeks and hyperventilation syndrome with a score of at least 24 points according to Nijmegen´s questionnaire were exclusion criteria for the present clinical trial [ 19 , 33 , 37 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the RUSI technique was used to evaluate static and dynamic core, deep muscles’ function in athletes, focusing on the abdominal wall [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], multifidus and lumbar muscles [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] and pelvic floor musculature [ 25 ]. Sports injury rehabilitation and prevention strategies commonly focused on RUSI visual biofeedback interventions for core muscles in athletes with LPP [ 21 , 22 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Visual Biofeedback of the Diaphragm in Conjunction with Inspiratory Muscle Training on Muscle Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Pulmonary Function in Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Marugán-Rubio

Chicharro

Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

et al. 2022

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diaphragmatic weakness and thickness reduction have been detected in athletes with lumbopelvic pain (LPP). Strength training of inspiratory muscles may be necessary for athletes with LPP. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and visual biofeedback by rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) have been proposed as possible interventions. Here, we determine the effectiveness of visual biofeedback by RUSI with a proposed novel thoracic orthotic device to facilitate diaphragmatic contraction in conjunction with high-intensity IMT in athletes with non-specific LPP. A single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was performed (NCT04097873). Of 86 participants assessed for eligibility, 64 athletes with non-specific LPP (39 males and 25 females; mean age, 33.15 ± 7.79 years) were recruited, randomized, analyzed and received diaphragm visual biofeedback by RUSI in conjunction with high-intensity IMT (RUSI+IMT; n = 32) or isolated high-intensity IMT (IMT; n = 32) interventions for 8 weeks. Diaphragmatic thickness during normal breathing, maximum respiratory pressures, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold on lumbar musculature, disability by the Roland–Morris questionnaire, quality of life by the SF-12 questionnaire and spirometry respiratory parameters were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. There were significant differences (p = 0.015), within a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.62) for the forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1), which was increased in the RUSI+IMT intervention group relative to the IMT alone group. Adverse effects were not observed. The rest of the outcomes did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Diaphragm visual biofeedback by RUSI with the proposed novel thoracic orthotic device in conjunction with high-intensity IMT improved lung function by increasing FEV1 in athletes with non-specific LPP.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Visual Biofeedback of the Diaphragm in Conjunction with Inspiratory Muscle Training on Muscle Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Pulmonary Function in Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Marugán-Rubio

Chicharro

Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

et al. 2022

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Exclusion criteria included lumbopelvic congenital alterations, rheumatic or neuromuscular conditions, body mass index (BMI) > 31 kg/m 2 , previous diagnoses regarding respiratory or neurological conditions, surgeries, lower extremity pathologies (such as sprains, fractures, or chronic ankle instability), skin alterations, and inability to follow the instructions to complete the correct study course. In addition, rest and physical reductions of fitness or daily exercise for more than four weeks in addition to the presence of hyperventilation syndrome assessed by the Nijmegen’s test with a score ≥24 points were also considered as exclusion criteria [ 16 , 30 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to previous studies using US assessments, the RUSI technique was applied to determine static and dynamic functioning of the core deep muscles from athletes, including abdominal wall muscles [ 15 , 16 , 17 ], multifidus, and low back muscles [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] in addition to pelvic floor muscles [ 22 ]. Furthermore, these core muscles were included in rehabilitation and prevention of sports injuries by RUSI visual biofeedback in athletes with lumbopelvic pain [ 18 , 19 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Manual Versus Specific Device Transcostal Measurements for Breathing Diaphragm Thickness by Ultrasonography in Lumbopelvic Pain Athletes

Marugán-Rubio

Chicharro

Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

et al. 2021

Sensors

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) to evaluate diaphragm thickness during breathing in athletes who suffer from non-specific lumbopelvic pain presents some measurement errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter-sessions, intra- and inter-rater reliabilities, and concurrent validity of diaphragm thickness measurements during breathing using transcostal RUSI with a novel thoracic orthotic device that was used to fix the US probe versus those measurements obtained using manual fixation. A total of 37 athletes with non-specific lumbopelvic pain were recruited. Intra- (same examiner) and inter-rater (two examiners) and intra- (same day) and inter-session (alternate days) reliabilities were analyzed. All measurements were obtained after manual probe fixation and after positioning the thoracic orthotic device to fix the US probe in order to correctly correlate both measurement methods. Both left and right hemi-diaphragm thickness measurements were performed by transcostal RUSI at maximum inspiration, expiration, and the difference between the two parameters during relaxed breathing. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), standard errors of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable changes (MCD), systematic errors, and correlations (r) were assessed. Orthotic device probe fixation showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.852–0.996, SEM = 0.0002–0.054, and MDC = 0.002–0.072), and most measurements did not show significant systematic errors (p > 0.05). Despite manual probe fixation with a reliability ranging from good to excellent (ICC = 0.714–0.997, SEM = 0.003–0.023, and MDC = 0.008–0.064 cm), several significant systematic measurement errors (p < 0.05) were found. Most significant correlations between both orthotic device and manual probe fixation methods were moderate (r = 0.486–0.718; p < 0.05). Bland–Altman plots indicated adequate agreement between both measurement methods according to the agreement limits. The proposed novel thoracic orthotic device may allow ultrasound probe fixation to provide valid and reliable transcostal RUSI measurements of diaphragmatic thickness during relaxed breathing thus reducing some measurement errors and avoiding systematic measurement errors. It may be advisable to measure diaphragm thickness and facilitate visual biofeedback with respect to diaphragm re-education during normal breathing in athletes with non-specific lumbopelvic pain.

show abstract

“…Improving the quality of movements is an important component of improving technique in sports dancing [43,44]. The special tests for balance and a three-dimensional analysis of movement with the determination of biomechanical parameters were used in the study [43] for this purpose.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Priority scientific areas in sports dances research: the analysis of the scientific resources of Web of Science Core Collection

Podrihalo

Xiaohong

Mulyk

et al. 2022

PES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Study Aim. The increase in the popularity of sports dances recently has been confirmed. Dancing combines sports and aesthetic components. Dances are used for sports, recreational and rehabilitation purposes. The study aim is an analytical analysis of publications devoted to sports dances and the determination of priority scientific areas in this field. Material and Methods. The bibliometric database Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) is analyzed. For the primary analysis, 618 sources were selected which met the search criteria for 2018–2022. We used bibliometric methods for processing the information received in the context of sports dances for 173 sources. The VOSviewer 1.6.18 program was used: keyword analysis method and direct citation analysis with the construction of bibliometric maps, visualization of cluster density, weights – citations. Results. The constructed bibliometric maps made it possible to identify the leading thematic areas of research, current areas of research in this field. They can be divided into sports, recreational, medical and rehabilitation areas. The sports context is aimed at studying the performance of technical elements, the development of the physical qualities of athletes, the assessment of physical fitness, the dynamics of the morphofunctional state. Psychophysiological studies are aimed at analyzing balance and equilibrium. Publications of a recreational orientation study the health-improving use of dances, their impact on health. The medical and rehabilitation direction explores the features of sports injuries in dancing, injury prevention and the possibility of using dances in the complex rehabilitation. The use of the VOSviewer program, version 1.6.18, made it possible to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the problem, to determine the priority scientific directions in this area. Conclusions. The conducted bibliometric analysis of publications confirms the relevance of the problem of sports dances. A constant research interest in this problem has been determined. Research in this area has a pronounced sports and medical focus. Bibliometric analysis of publications allows identification the three following areas: sports, recreation and rehabilitation. Dancing is being explored as a sport, a form of physical activity, and a form of rehabilitation. A fairly high level of sports injuries has led to interest in the analysis of the prevalence and prevention of injuries. Its characteristic feature is the intersection of these directions. The study of athletes’ state confirmed the lack of works devoted to a comprehensive study of athletes, predicting success and skill growth. There are not enough works studying the physical state of sports dancers. There are practically no studies aimed at studying the psychophysiological state. These types of studies should be assessed as relevant.

show abstract

Comparison of lumbopelvic and dynamic stability between dancers and non-dancers

Cited by 11 publications

References 34 publications

Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Visual Biofeedback of the Diaphragm in Conjunction with Inspiratory Muscle Training on Muscle Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Pulmonary Function in Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Visual Biofeedback of the Diaphragm in Conjunction with Inspiratory Muscle Training on Muscle Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Pulmonary Function in Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Manual Versus Specific Device Transcostal Measurements for Breathing Diaphragm Thickness by Ultrasonography in Lumbopelvic Pain Athletes

Priority scientific areas in sports dances research: the analysis of the scientific resources of Web of Science Core Collection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About