2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of load profiles in a mini-grid: Assessment of performance metrics using measured and interview-based data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As high as 426 Wh/day per consumer of mean absolute error has been observed over a study of eight rural minigrids in Kenya (Blodgett et al 2017). Hartvigsson and Ahlgren (2018) compare the load profiles in a minigrid from interviews as well as measured data. Their study concludes that purely interview-based data falls short in accurately estimating energy needs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As high as 426 Wh/day per consumer of mean absolute error has been observed over a study of eight rural minigrids in Kenya (Blodgett et al 2017). Hartvigsson and Ahlgren (2018) compare the load profiles in a minigrid from interviews as well as measured data. Their study concludes that purely interview-based data falls short in accurately estimating energy needs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coincidence factor (CF) is defined as the ratio of the peak load power in the load profile to the total rated power of all the installed appliances in the energy system, as shown in Eq. 4 (Hartvigsson and Ahlgren 2018). It is a measure of the likelihood of all the loads constituting the load profile functioning simultaneously.…”
Section: Coincidence Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of the accuracy of surveyed data is widely recognized in the literature. In [22] the authors compared load profiles and performance metrics based on interviews and on measurements relating to a rural mini-grid in Tanzania, finding distinct differences between estimations and measured data. The largest difference was in the calculated energy, which is also reflected in the load factor and capacity factor, which are underestimated by 34-117% using the interview-based method, whereas the estimate of the peak load shows a much smaller error (11%).…”
Section: The Relevance Of Accuracy In the Energy Need Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For developers with operating data, historical energy use from existing customers may inform these estimates. Developers and recent studies have shown that customers are not good at predicting their own energy use behavior; as a result, the inventory method tends to overestimate electricity demand (Blodgett et al 2017;Hartvigsson and Ahlgren 2018).…”
Section: Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not surprising that users who have never had a connection to electricity would have a difficult time predicting their own consumption. Further, Hartvigsson and Ahlgren (2018) found that consumers who already have a connection have difficulty estimating their consumption using the same method.…”
Section: Customer Surveys In Tanzaniamentioning
confidence: 99%