1997
DOI: 10.2307/1468242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Litterfall Input to Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
119
1
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
119
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount, and type of vegetation present within riparian zones is a critical determinant of litter inputs to streams (Benfield 1997). In this study, we found that litter input dynamics varied significantly with land use, and more specifically with the types and amount of riparian vegetation present.…”
Section: Land-use Effects On Mass Timing and Composition Of Litter mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The amount, and type of vegetation present within riparian zones is a critical determinant of litter inputs to streams (Benfield 1997). In this study, we found that litter input dynamics varied significantly with land use, and more specifically with the types and amount of riparian vegetation present.…”
Section: Land-use Effects On Mass Timing and Composition Of Litter mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…They suggested that this was the result of a dense understorey and attenuated windspeeds. Benfield (1997) noted the high degree of variability in relative contribution of lateral and vertical inputs to the total litter budget. In deciduous forest sites of the eastern United States, lateral inputs generally made up less than or equal to 30% of vertical litter inputs, whereas in a steep-sided stream in Oregon, the coniferous forest contributed twice more litter to the streams by lateral pathways than by vertical inputs.…”
Section: Land-use Effects On Mass Timing and Composition Of Litter mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In temperate forested streams, most litter inputs occur in autumn after leaf abscission, i.e., during high discharge and surface runoff following high rainfall in the autumn and winter, even though a substantial part of detritus from the stream banks and the adjacent zones may also be subject to lateral movement and therefore continue entering streams over the whole year (Benfield, 1997). In parallel, as reported by Brunke and Gonser (1997) and Naegeli et al (1995), even though, usually most of the fine and coarse POM are carried in the sediments during floods (i.e., late autumn and winter), Bretschko and Moser (1993) demonstrated that in a porous gravel stream more than 80% of the annual POM input was transported into the sediment in spring and summer during high discharge fluctuations, while a small proportion (i.e., < 10%) entered after litter fall.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Cpom In the Interstitial Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood enters streams mainly by litterfall from trees but also laterally by being washed into the stream during inundation of floodplains (Benfield 1997). However, the lateral input of wood litter from the floodplain to the stream can be higher sometimes than the amount of litterfall (Cuffney 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%