2001
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2001.9517040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors controlling litter input dynamics in streams draining pasture, pine, and native forest catchments

Abstract: The effects of varying land use on the inputs of litter to streams were investigated in nine small Waikato, New Zealand, hill country streams between June 1995 and October 1997. Mass, timing, and composition of both vertical and lateral litter inputs were measured. Litter inputs to pasture streams were lower than those to streams in native or exotic pine forest. Litter inputs to native forest streams peaked in summer, with leaf material forming the dominant litter-type throughout the year. The pine forest site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, changes in catchment land use and riparian vegetation have been shown to influence allochthonous inputs (Benfield, 1997;Scarsbrook et al, 2001) and autochthonous production (Young & Huryn, 1999). Agricultural practices, in particular, are expected to significantly alter C sources to stream ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, changes in catchment land use and riparian vegetation have been shown to influence allochthonous inputs (Benfield, 1997;Scarsbrook et al, 2001) and autochthonous production (Young & Huryn, 1999). Agricultural practices, in particular, are expected to significantly alter C sources to stream ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These riparian conditions influence instream habitat conditions in terms of sediment supply, detrital inputs, provision of shade and habitat for invertebrates and fish (Townsend et al, 1997;Winterbourn, 2000;Scarsbrook et al, 2001; Table II). Enhancement activities were aimed at reducing the cover of inorganic material, which would introduce fine sediments into the and all five streams flowed through urban areas the stream sections (i.e.…”
Section: Riparian Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landuse activities also alter organic inputs in streams, changing their dominant carbon sources (Young & Huryn, 1999;Scarsbrook et al, 2001). Terrestrial inputs often dominate carbon sources in forested streams (Fisher & Likens, 1973;Wallace et al, 1999;Scarsbrook et al, 2001), but agricultural and forestry activities generally reduce litter inputs and their subsequent storage (Duncan & Brusven, 1985;Webster et al, 1990;DeLong & Brusven, 1994;Scarsbrook et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial inputs often dominate carbon sources in forested streams (Fisher & Likens, 1973;Wallace et al, 1999;Scarsbrook et al, 2001), but agricultural and forestry activities generally reduce litter inputs and their subsequent storage (Duncan & Brusven, 1985;Webster et al, 1990;DeLong & Brusven, 1994;Scarsbrook et al, 2001). Epilithon (e.g., diatom films, filamentous green algae (FGA), or heterotrophic biofilms) is also ubiquitous on stones in streams, where it can represent important carbon sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%