1983 International Electron Devices Meeting 1983
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.1983.190466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of latch-up in p- and n-well CMOS circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the values were found t o have very little quantitative effect on the latch-up characteristics [53], [54]; in fact the strong resistance temperature dependence (a factor of 7 has been measured for temperatures ranging from 150 K to 400 K [44] causes a propotional increase in the current required to forward bias the BJT's emitter-base junctions, thus effectively changing the bipolar bias configuration at the triggering point.…”
Section: Effects O F Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the values were found t o have very little quantitative effect on the latch-up characteristics [53], [54]; in fact the strong resistance temperature dependence (a factor of 7 has been measured for temperatures ranging from 150 K to 400 K [44] causes a propotional increase in the current required to forward bias the BJT's emitter-base junctions, thus effectively changing the bipolar bias configuration at the triggering point.…”
Section: Effects O F Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1980s and early 1990s new semiconductor processes further enhanced the CMOS latchup robustness of the mainstream CMOS technologies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In CMOS technology, semiconductor process solutions were integrated to improve the CMOS latchup issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of boron concentration in the epi.. taxial wafer, the boron concentration at a position in the epitaxial film sufficiently far from the interface between the epitaxial film and the substrate at time t, C,, is fixed to the value measured by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), CObS, as shown in Fig. 2b = C0, [4] Although Eq. 1 can be analytically solved for evaporation and diffusion from the substrate to the epitaxial layer individually, the epitaxial growth must be performed immediately after the prebaking process in which a native oxide film is removed from the substrate surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%