2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2010.11.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of k-nearest neighbor, quadratic discriminant and linear discriminant analysis in classification of electromyogram signals based on the wrist-motion directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
120
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Temporal characteristics were calculated based on the sEMG signal amplitude, which is simpler than the calculating frequency characteristic using the Fourier transform. Thus, in this paper three representative characteristics [11,12], which are MAV, RMS and logD, are Selected to decode the surface EMG by taking 8-channels sEMG characteristics at the same time.…”
Section: Methods For Grasping Force Estimation and Experimental Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal characteristics were calculated based on the sEMG signal amplitude, which is simpler than the calculating frequency characteristic using the Fourier transform. Thus, in this paper three representative characteristics [11,12], which are MAV, RMS and logD, are Selected to decode the surface EMG by taking 8-channels sEMG characteristics at the same time.…”
Section: Methods For Grasping Force Estimation and Experimental Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of the art comprises a lot of machine learning methods that are applied to sEMG signals with promising results [15], [16], [17]. The main blocks of the classification chain needed in the prosthetic hand control consist on i) filtering and pre-processing; ii) segmentation; iii) features extraction and iv) classification.…”
Section: E Machine Learning Methods For Semg-based Hand Movement Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krzanowski (1977) reviewed the performance of Fisher's linear discriminant function when underlying assumptions are violated. Many classification methods, both parametric and non-parametric, have been compared with LDA and QDA under normality and non-normality which include Ghosh and Chaudhuri (2005), Kim et al (2011) and Li et al (2012) among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%