The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ischemia-modified albumin levels in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unstable angina pectoris with versus without coronary collaterals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with other studies [3,11,13] we have found a significant elevation of IMA values in ACS compared to NICP group. Furthermore, IMA was significantly higher in the subgroup of AMI than in UA, suggesting that IMA actually reflects the extent of myocardial ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In agreement with other studies [3,11,13] we have found a significant elevation of IMA values in ACS compared to NICP group. Furthermore, IMA was significantly higher in the subgroup of AMI than in UA, suggesting that IMA actually reflects the extent of myocardial ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…16 A recent study 17 involving patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS but with normal or nondiagnostic ECGs who came to the emergency department within 3 hours of chest pain documented outcomes at 30 days of ACS (unstable angina or MI with non-ST-segment elevation) or non-ischemic chest pain. They measured IMA at presentation and reported positive (LR 2.95, 95% CI 1.91-4.56) and negative (LR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) likelihood ratios using a threshold of 93.5 U/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the percutaneous coronary intervention model, IMA production is higher in patients without collateral vessels than in those with collateral circulation; thus, IMA possibly reflects a protective effect of collateral vessels against percutaneous coronary intervention-induced myocardial ischemia (4 ). IMA also appears to be useful for ruling out acute coronary syndrome in patients attending the emergency department with chest pain suggestive of myocardial ischemia (5 ).…”
Section: © 2004 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%