2004
DOI: 10.1002/lt.20205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of invasive and noninvasive measurement of plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A prospective investigator-blinded study

Abstract: Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (PDRICG) has been proposed for assessment of liver function in liver transplants donors and recipients, in patients with chronic liver failure, and as a prognostic factor in critically ill patients. The assessment of PDRICG using a newly developed noninvasive digital pulse densitometry method was simultaneously compared to invasive aortic fiber-optic method in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Fourteen consecutive liver transplant candida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, across the various studies the two parameters are used in a different and possibly confounding manner. ICGR15 is almost always considered for the dynamic assessment of hepatic functional reserve in case of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis (HCC) [5,8] ; ICGPDR and ICG R15 to assess liver graft function after liver transplantation [18] ; ICGPDR in the critical care setting [2,17] . ICGPDR and ICGR15 are determined using either the high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection (cumbersome and time consuming methodology) or, as almost always reported nowadays, the modern, non-invasive PDD method (pulse dye densitometry method and spectrophotometry) [6][7][8] .…”
Section: R15 (%) = Cicg15/cicgt0 × 100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, across the various studies the two parameters are used in a different and possibly confounding manner. ICGR15 is almost always considered for the dynamic assessment of hepatic functional reserve in case of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis (HCC) [5,8] ; ICGPDR and ICG R15 to assess liver graft function after liver transplantation [18] ; ICGPDR in the critical care setting [2,17] . ICGPDR and ICGR15 are determined using either the high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection (cumbersome and time consuming methodology) or, as almost always reported nowadays, the modern, non-invasive PDD method (pulse dye densitometry method and spectrophotometry) [6][7][8] .…”
Section: R15 (%) = Cicg15/cicgt0 × 100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient received 1 to 6 MARS treatments lasting for a median of 16 (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) hours. The combination of serum bilirubin Ͼ10 mg/dL, PDR ICG Ͻ10% per minute, AST/ALT Ͼ1,000 U/L, and PT Ͻ40% was present in 4 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Child-Pugh classification is used to evaluate the severity of liver cirrhosis, it cannot predict liver reserve necessary against invasion, so it is not able to make accurate assessment of liver function [4]. ICG clearance is an internationally recognized index for assessment of liver reserve and prediction of liver failure postoperation [5,6], but it is designed for the total liver reserve and can be affected by many factors; therefore, it has little value for the assessment of remnant liver reserve postoperation and preoperative prediction of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%