2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intubation devices in level C personal protective equipment: A cadaveric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Polish settings, EMS personnel are usually equipped with a full protective suit, a mask with FFP2 or FFP3 class filter, protective glasses, visor and double gloves. This garment reduces the risk of infection but, as numerous studies have shown, makes it difficult to perform medical procedures, including those so important for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, such as chest compressions [11], airway management [12,13], obtaining vascular access [14,15], or the administration of drugs and fluids during resuscitation [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Polish settings, EMS personnel are usually equipped with a full protective suit, a mask with FFP2 or FFP3 class filter, protective glasses, visor and double gloves. This garment reduces the risk of infection but, as numerous studies have shown, makes it difficult to perform medical procedures, including those so important for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, such as chest compressions [11], airway management [12,13], obtaining vascular access [14,15], or the administration of drugs and fluids during resuscitation [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These same participants had an Advanced Life Support Course, and reported having performed direct laryngoscopy at least 30 times in their career. In view of the above, after assessing the risk of bias by the highest degree identified in the domains, the general assessment of this study ( 15 ) was considered high risk, weakening the reliability of its results. This was the only study that was contrary to the favorable trend towards supraglottic devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, despite all the selected studies, a study was retrieved, whose participants were emergency physicians with level C personal protective equipment, performing orotracheal intubation and the insertion of supraglottic devices in cadavers ( 15 ) . The results suggest orotracheal intubation as a faster technique, with statistically significant data (p = 0.02) and with a higher success rate in the first attempt (direct laryngoscopy = 58% and supraglottic device = 21%) ( 15 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations