2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography–dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series by Morris et al (6), D 90 values of !130 Gy at Day 0 or Day 30 were predictive of an increased risk of recurrence in the non-NADT subset. Because D 90 values change greatly from 0 to 30 days postimplant (16), this factor may have accounted for a variable threshold of the doseeresponse relationship (3, 6e8 (26). In our patient selection, patients with bulky disease or Gleason score 4 þ 3 are treated with BT and supplemental EBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a series by Morris et al (6), D 90 values of !130 Gy at Day 0 or Day 30 were predictive of an increased risk of recurrence in the non-NADT subset. Because D 90 values change greatly from 0 to 30 days postimplant (16), this factor may have accounted for a variable threshold of the doseeresponse relationship (3, 6e8 (26). In our patient selection, patients with bulky disease or Gleason score 4 þ 3 are treated with BT and supplemental EBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A VariSeed planning system, version 7.2 (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was used for preplanning and intraoperative planning. The implant procedure and dose constraints have been previously described (15,16). Early in the study period, the preplanning method was used in the first 233 men (17.7%), and from December 2004 onward, the procedure was shifted to the real-time intraoperative planned approach (13).…”
Section: Implant Technique and Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohashi et al . compared intra-operative TRUS based dosimetry with actual day 1 and day 30 coverage and found no difference between intra-operative and day 30 target coverage [20]. While this may eliminate the need for post-operative CT-based dosimetry in the future, a large proportion of centers have not yet adopted an intra-operative planning approach and, therefore, must continue to depend on post-implant CT-based dosimetry to evaluate the quality of their implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waterman et al also reported that the probability of late rectal morbidity depends both on the dose and on the rectal surface area exposed to 100 Gy radiations [5]. These dose-volume thresholds of the rectal wall could not be adopted as intraoperative constraints for brachytherapy because of discrepancies in dose distribution between intraoperative ultrasound (US)-based and postoperative CT-based dosimetry [6-8]. To date, there appears to be no definitive agreement regarding rV100 constraints during interactive dose assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there appears to be no definitive agreement regarding rV100 constraints during interactive dose assessments. Some investigators have adopted presumptive rV100 constraints, such as 1.0 cc [9], while others have neglected to apply any safe range with rV100 [6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%