2010
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2009.120790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of inspiratory and expiratory resistance and reactance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract: Background The usual analysis of forced oscillometry measures respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) averaged over several tidal breaths (whole-breath analysis). Recent within-breath analyses have separated Rrs and Xrs into their mean inspiratory and mean expiratory components (inspiratoryeexpiratory breath analysis) but these have not been used to compare patients with asthma and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Large inspiratoryeexpiratory variations in Xrs at 5 Hz (DX5) in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
93
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic airway narrowing during quiet breathing at rest has been visually detected in a patient with severe COPD by high-speed electron-beam computed tomography (26). The EFL index is useful for the differentiation between COPD and asthma (12,14,29). In multivariate regression analyses, a high EFL index (more than 0.55 cmH2O/L/s measured with MostGraph) was independently predicted by the emphysema score, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC, functional residual capacity, and whole-breath R5 (30).…”
Section: Xrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic airway narrowing during quiet breathing at rest has been visually detected in a patient with severe COPD by high-speed electron-beam computed tomography (26). The EFL index is useful for the differentiation between COPD and asthma (12,14,29). In multivariate regression analyses, a high EFL index (more than 0.55 cmH2O/L/s measured with MostGraph) was independently predicted by the emphysema score, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC, functional residual capacity, and whole-breath R5 (30).…”
Section: Xrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this technique, Paredi and colleagues have shown that while whole breath impulse oscillometry could not differentiate patients with asthma and COPD, patients with COPD had higher mean expiratory X5 than those with asthma, which they thought might be due to enhanced dynamic airway narrowing on expiration in these patients. 62 Another study has shown that in comparing FOT in patients with asthma and COPD, only patients with COPD show a significant difference in X RS between inspiration and expiration 63 ( Fig. 8).…”
Section: Measurement Of Airway Resistance By the Forced Oscillation Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DFA of respiratory system impedance was not able to differentiate COPD from asthma or healthy control subjects, a distance-based time series analysis was able to distinguish asthma and COPD in the majority of cases (22). In moderate COPD, there are larger differences between inspiratory and expiratory FOT reactance compared with patients with asthma and healthy control subjects (74), and this difference is more variable over time and correlates well with dyspnea (75). Home monitoring of lung function by FOT in patients with COPD has recently been shown to be feasible and reliable (76), suggesting a great potential role for monitoring of FOT variability in COPD.…”
Section: Implications For Copd?mentioning
confidence: 88%