Environmental Impact 2012
DOI: 10.2495/eid120511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of indoor and outdoor fungi and particles in poultry units

Abstract: A descriptive study was developed in order to compare indoor and outdoor air contamination caused by fungi and particles in seven poultry units. Twenty eight air samples of 25 litters were collected through the impaction method on malt extract agar. Air sampling and particles concentration measurement were done in the interior and also outside premises of the poultries' pavilions.Regarding the fungal load in the air, indoor concentration of mold was higher than outside air in six poultry units. Twenty eight sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the existing study, a low microbial count was seen in the outdoor of these facilities, moreover, outdoor fungal species were found different as compared to indoor. The similar results for fungus were also reported for both indoor and outdoor of these facilities by Viegas et al (2012). The results were also comparable to Crook et al (2008) and Lonc and Plew, (2011), who reported low microbial count in the outdoor as compared to the indoor of these facilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the existing study, a low microbial count was seen in the outdoor of these facilities, moreover, outdoor fungal species were found different as compared to indoor. The similar results for fungus were also reported for both indoor and outdoor of these facilities by Viegas et al (2012). The results were also comparable to Crook et al (2008) and Lonc and Plew, (2011), who reported low microbial count in the outdoor as compared to the indoor of these facilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, in the existing study, different types of fungi that were observed in the air samples were not recorded in the litter samples. This suggests different sources are contributing to fungal load in the air such as feed, bird's feather, excreta and skin dandruff (Gigli et al, 2005;Viegas et al, 2012). Moreover, it was also reported by De Lucca, (2007), that fungal species that were not recorded in litter samples may be due to excessive use of antibacterial medicines that suppress the growth of fungal species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Some studies already reported fungal contamination in poultry facilities being a potential reservoir of fungi [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ]. On the other hand, the role of bedding material regarding this subject remains little-explored [ 6 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have reported on the air pollution inside and outside the chicken house caused by fungi and particles. Researchers found that the concentrations of indoor fungi and particles were higher than those of outdoor air, and the species of indoor and outdoor fungi were different ( 18 ). Although some fungi appear in indoor and outdoor air at the same time, there is no evidence that indoor fungal pollution comes from outdoor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%