1997
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76258-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of In Situ and In Vitro Techniques for Measuring Ruminal Degradation of Animal By-Product Proteins

Abstract: Ruminally undegraded protein (RUP) values of blood meal (n = 2), hydrolyzed feather meal (n = 2), fish meal (n = 2), meat and bone meal, and soybean meal were estimated using an in situ method, an inhibitor in vitro method, and an inhibitor in vitro technique applying Michaelis-Menten saturation kinetics. Degradation rates for in situ and inhibitor in vitro methods were calculated by regression of the natural log of the proportion of crude protein (CP) remaining undegraded versus time. Nonlinear regression ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the offsetting effects observed for the solubility and the degradation rate, the degradability values for CP and TAA were similar, which shows that the degradability of true protein of SBM should not be different to that of the total nitrogen compounds. The CP degradability value was somewhat higher than the mean values of 62% and 65% recorded, respectively, by Verite et al [33] and the National Research Council [17], but it is close to those of Aufrere et al [2], and England et al [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As a consequence of the offsetting effects observed for the solubility and the degradation rate, the degradability values for CP and TAA were similar, which shows that the degradability of true protein of SBM should not be different to that of the total nitrogen compounds. The CP degradability value was somewhat higher than the mean values of 62% and 65% recorded, respectively, by Verite et al [33] and the National Research Council [17], but it is close to those of Aufrere et al [2], and England et al [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The various degradability parameters for the nylon bags were analysed by a variance analysis (SAS GLM procedure [33] Madsen and Hvelplund [23], Inra [20] and Aufr6re et al [3], but it is close to those of Windschit and Stem [43] and England et al [13]. The 'a' value of the immediately soluble fraction of the control meal is low and agrees with the DE1 results and those in the literature, and is due to the high temperature (around 115-120 °C) applied in the technical oil extraction process.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear increase (P = 0.001) in DM digestibility was probably related to the replacement of the basal diet with RUP from animal sources (O'Mara et al, 1998). The quadratic response for apparent N digestibility and the interaction (P = 0.02) between supplement composition and level of feeding probably reflects the conclusion of England et al (1997), from their in vitro work, that post-ruminal N digestibility of hydrolyzed FTM could limit its value as an RUP source.…”
Section: Dmi and Nitrogen Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The linear increase in milk protein content likely reflects the improved postruminal supply of AA to support milk protein synthesis. Animal-based protein sources, including FM and FTM, are resistant to rapid degradation in the rumen and can increase the postruminal delivery, of AA (England et al, 1997;O'Mara et al, 1998) to support increased milk protein synthesis. The advantage of relatively more FM compared with more FTM to support increased milk protein content is supported by the work of England et al (1997), who concluded from their in vitro pepsin-HCl incubations that the RUP value of FTM could be restricted by its lower intestinal digestibility.…”
Section: Milk Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation