2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-019-00738-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of IC-RT-PCR, Dot-ELISA and Indirect-ELISA for the Detection of Sorghum Mosaic Virus in Field-Grown Sugarcane Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ELISA experiment was explored by using a slightly modified procedure [ 26 ]. Plant sap from infected sugarcane, healthy sugarcane, and a definite negative sample (as a negative control) was extracted by fully grinding 1 g of blades in liquid nitrogen followed by suspension in 500 μL of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ELISA experiment was explored by using a slightly modified procedure [ 26 ]. Plant sap from infected sugarcane, healthy sugarcane, and a definite negative sample (as a negative control) was extracted by fully grinding 1 g of blades in liquid nitrogen followed by suspension in 500 μL of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hema et al [ 138 ] reported that IC-RT-PCR was 5,000 times more sensitive than DBIA and 10 times more sensitive than DB-PCR to detect SCSMV. Chen et al [ 139 ] demonstrated that the sensitivity of detecting SrMV by IC-RT-PCR 100-times higher than that of indirect ELISA and 1000-times higher than that of Dot-ELISA and therefore recommended IC-RT-PCR was more suitable for large volumes of samples. Subba et al [ 140 ] developed a D-IC-RT-PCR method that combined both serological and molecular methods to simultaneously detect and distinguish SCMV and SCSMV and was more sensitive than DAC-ELISA.…”
Section: Diagnosis/identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional detection methods used for SrMV include real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR, conventional RT-PCR, reverse transcription loop-mediated amplification (RT-LAMP), and indirect ELISA detection [ 12 , 13 ]. However, these methods have limitations too, and the detection cycle might take up to an hour since they require sophisticated laboratory equipment and costly temperature-controlled amplification devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%