Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non‐cross‐linked porcine small intestine serosal‐derived collagen implants in a rat model

Abstract

Objective To compare the host response, architectural integration and tensile strength of polypropylene and porcine small intestine submucosa-derived implants in a rat model. Design Experimental study.Setting Center for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Sample Forty-eight adult male Wistar rats weighing 220-250 g randomised to receive either implant.Methods Full thickness abdominal wall defects were primarily repaired with polypropylene mesh (Marlex) (MX group) or porcine small intestine submucosa (Surgisis) (SIS group). Animals were sacrificed at 7, 14, 30 and 90 days after implantation. Main outcome measures The presence of herniation, infection and intra-peritoneal adhesions. Change in thickness and tensile strength of implant. Histopathological and immunohistochemical appearances of inflammatory response and collagen deposition. Results Implants from the SIS group showed a short term increase in thickness in the first 14 days. Formation of adhesions was significantly more intense in the MX group at 30 days, and more extensive in the SIS group at 90 days. Tensile strength increased over time in both groups but was significantly lower in the SIS group than the MX group at 30 days. Implants in the MX group showed a more pronounced inflammatory response and more pronounced new vessel formation than the SIS group. Collagen formation was initially more fibrous and better organised in the MX group but became greater in the SIS group at 90 days. Conclusions Biologically derived implant material induced a less pronounced inflammatory response and differences in collagen deposition. At 30 days tensile strength was weaker in the biological implant group but was equivalent by 90 days. These differences may have implications for the in vivo performance of the materials.

Reconstruction of abdominal wall defects using small intestinal submucosa coated with gelatin hydrogel incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor

“…In order to increase the effect of abdominal wall reconstruction, modifications and Several studies have shown that bFGF could promote fibroblast proliferation, stimulate angiogenesis in the dermis, and healing of fascial tissues 5,18 . However, effective use of bFGF is not always achieved due to its rapid diffusion into body fluids and short half-life 19,20 .…”

Experiência inicial no tratamento endoscópico de fístulas gastrocutâneas pós-gastroplastia vertical redutora através da aplicação de matriz acelular fibrogênica

“…A versatilidade da aplicação clínica deste material reflete sua capacidade de estimular a cicatrização, com mínima reação inflamatória, sem rejeição. De fato, no modelo experimental em ratos Wistar, a comparação entre a reação suscitada pelo implante abdominal de telas feitas de polipropileno ou de SurgiSIS ® revela igual deposição de colágeno, força tênsil semelhante, com menor reação inflamatória e aderências quando do emprego do material biológico (12) . Recentemente, foi estudada a reação imunológica ao SurgiSIS ® em pacientes submetidos a implante para correção de hérnia inguinal.…”

“…Este material consiste em matriz acelular, produzida a partir da submucosa do intestino delgado porcino. Estimula a taxia celular, dando suporte para a proliferação e formação de verdadeira rede de fibroblastos, sendo, posteriormente, incorporada pela cicatriz, sem estimular reação inflamatória de corpo estranho (12) .…”

Giant Omphalocele Complicated by Postoperative Duodenal Obstruction

“…Infection, inflammation, adhesions, fistula formation, hematoma, seroma, recurrence are the complications known with the use of mesh. [4] We attempted repair without mesh and found it feasible with strict postoperative monitoring. Within a week child's abdominal cavity accommodated the liver very well.…”