2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hospitalization and mortality associated with short-term exposure to ambient ozone and PM2.5 in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The few existing multi-city studies of the association between ambient PM 2.5 exposure and all-cause hospital admissions obtained estimated risks that tended to be similar to our present findings. A recent study of 24 Canadian cities estimated a 0.29% (95% CI: 0.03–0.56%) increase in all-cause hospital admissions due to ambient PM 2.5 exposure [ 42 ]. A recent study of 200 Chinese cities estimated a 0.20% (95% CI: 0.08–0.31%) increase due to ambient PM 2.5 exposure [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few existing multi-city studies of the association between ambient PM 2.5 exposure and all-cause hospital admissions obtained estimated risks that tended to be similar to our present findings. A recent study of 24 Canadian cities estimated a 0.29% (95% CI: 0.03–0.56%) increase in all-cause hospital admissions due to ambient PM 2.5 exposure [ 42 ]. A recent study of 200 Chinese cities estimated a 0.20% (95% CI: 0.08–0.31%) increase due to ambient PM 2.5 exposure [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People are becoming more and more interested in the role of sex and gender played in the epidemiology relevant to air pollution. Several recent studies have reported that pollutants have a greater impact on female’s respiratory health than male 47 , 48 . A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between pollutants and death rate found that in a highly polluted environment, the risk for females increased by 1.12% and that for males increased by 0.73% 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because women may have stronger airway responsiveness, combined with hormones or other factors, and therefore had a stronger physiological response to air pollutants [42,43]. However, there was also con icting research evidence that men were more susceptible to the impact of PM 2.5 on non-accidental mortality [44,45]. In contrast, we found that men were more susceptible to the effects of O 3 on respiratory mortality than women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%