2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of highly conductive natural and synthetic graphites for electrodes in perovskite solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the bandgap of the CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 ‐based perovskite utilized in this study is approximately 1.6 eV [ 48 ] and V br < 4 V, the junction breakdown probably occurs first via tunneling, followed by the thermal runaway. It was previously observed that in PSCs thermal runaway causes localized heating of the metal back‐contact, causing electrode melting (e.g., silver).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the bandgap of the CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 ‐based perovskite utilized in this study is approximately 1.6 eV [ 48 ] and V br < 4 V, the junction breakdown probably occurs first via tunneling, followed by the thermal runaway. It was previously observed that in PSCs thermal runaway causes localized heating of the metal back‐contact, causing electrode melting (e.g., silver).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our 4‐point probe measurements, the sheet resistance of the carbon‐based electrode and FTO is around 18 ± 2 and 8.5 ± 1.5 Ω sq −1 , respectively, demonstrating that there are more resistive losses in the back‐contact rather than in the front‐electrode. [ 48 ] This suggests that the current path with the least resistance (marked with green color in Figure 5b) contains minimal distance through the back‐electrode (carbon) and maximal distance through the front‐electrode (FTO). Clearly, such path goes through regions close to the laser line, which is why the DLIT signal increases at this location first (as seen from Video S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For LTCN paste, 2 gm CNP, 0.25 gm graphite and 15 ml chlorobenzene was ball milled for 8 h. The collected paste was utilized for the blade-coating technique. The use of a small amount of graphite is highly suitable for better contact of the electrode with the perovskite layer 51 , 52 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining measurement results from the series resistance losses in both cell structures (Note S6, Supporting Information), it becomes clear that the FF in H-CPSCs is limited by the non-radiative losses, induced by numerous grain-boundaries, whereas the FF of L-CPSC strongly suffers from the interfacial resistance at the perovskite/carbon contact (Figure 6a). The losses in the electrodes can be reduced further by selecting a more conductive TCO front contact and the conductivity of the carbon-based contact can be improved by altering the graphite crystal type, [71] surface functionalization, and dopants. [14] Other ohmic FF losses, except for the electrodes are negligible, while additional FF losses, could possibly be alleviated by improving perovskite/TiO 2 contact and reducing its interfacial resistance.…”
Section: Outlining Promising Strategies To Improve the Pce Of Cpscsmentioning
confidence: 99%