2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fracture resistance as measured by the indentation fracture method and fracture toughness determined by the single-edge-precracked beam technique using silicon nitrides with different microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amounts of the sintering additives of the first two sets of samples were fixed at 2.5 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 2.5 wt% Y 2 O 3 (A group) and 5 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 5 wt% Y 2 O 3 (B group) as listed in Table 1. The sintering temperature and soaking time of these samples were varied as follows: 1750 8C for 1 h, 1850 8C for 1 h, 1950 8C for 2 h and 1950 8C for 8 h. By contrast, the amount of the additives of the last set of samples was changed from 1 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 1 wt% Y 2 O 3 to 10 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 10 wt% Y 2 O 3 while the sintering condition was set constant at 1950 8C for 2 h. The detailed fabrication procedure was described in our previous papers [17,18]. Silicon nitrides from commercial sources were also used as test materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amounts of the sintering additives of the first two sets of samples were fixed at 2.5 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 2.5 wt% Y 2 O 3 (A group) and 5 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 5 wt% Y 2 O 3 (B group) as listed in Table 1. The sintering temperature and soaking time of these samples were varied as follows: 1750 8C for 1 h, 1850 8C for 1 h, 1950 8C for 2 h and 1950 8C for 8 h. By contrast, the amount of the additives of the last set of samples was changed from 1 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 1 wt% Y 2 O 3 to 10 wt% Al 2 O 3 and 10 wt% Y 2 O 3 while the sintering condition was set constant at 1950 8C for 2 h. The detailed fabrication procedure was described in our previous papers [17,18]. Silicon nitrides from commercial sources were also used as test materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture resistance of the former samples showed relatively higher value than those of the latter samples except the OP3 sample, as well. Quantitative analysis of microstructures for some selected samples together with its relation to the mechanical properties can be found in our previous studies [17][18][19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens have been fabricated and tested with the a/w ratio of about 0.5 (where a is the groove depth and w is the width of the sample). The calculation procedure and accuracy of fracture toughness values obtained from these methods have been thoroughly covered in [1][2][3][4][5][6] and [36]. Fracture toughness values have been measured for four times in SEVNB and SENB methods, and three times in CNB method.…”
Section: Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chevron notch bar (CNB) [1][2][3], single-edge notch beam (SENB) [2][3][4][5][6], single-edge V-notched beam (SEVNB), single-edge pre-cracked beam (SEPB) [4,5], edge-loaded split (ELS) [7,8] and the double cantilever beam (DCB) are some of these methods, most of which have limited usage because of the difficulty in preparing the ceramic samples and high expenses associated with implementation. To solve this problem, a new method has emerged in the last few decades, which relies on the evaluation of indenter's effect left in the materials [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrohardness and fracture toughness values have been determined, at room temperature, on the polished surface considering an average of five indentation using Vickers indentation method [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] with 20 kg load for 15 s. The crack paths, introduced by Vickers indentation with 20 kg load, were investigated in order to evaluate toughening mechanisms. Calculation of the fracture toughness ''K IC '' was carried out based on the nature of cracks observed.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%