2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four regionalisation methods for a distributed hydrological model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
4
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Samaniego et al (2010b), these approaches can be broadly classified into post-regionalization and simultaneous regionalization approaches, depending on if the regionalization function parameters (or global parameters) are estimated after (Abdulla and Lettenmaier, 1997;Seibert, 1999;Wagener and Wheater, 2006;Livneh and Lettenmaier, 2013) or during the model calibration (Fernandez et al, 2000;Hundecha and Bárdossy, 2004;Gotzinger and Bárdossy, 2007;Pokhrel and Gupta, 2010). None of these procedures consider the subgrid variability of the model parameters or geophysical characteristics.…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Samaniego et al (2010b), these approaches can be broadly classified into post-regionalization and simultaneous regionalization approaches, depending on if the regionalization function parameters (or global parameters) are estimated after (Abdulla and Lettenmaier, 1997;Seibert, 1999;Wagener and Wheater, 2006;Livneh and Lettenmaier, 2013) or during the model calibration (Fernandez et al, 2000;Hundecha and Bárdossy, 2004;Gotzinger and Bárdossy, 2007;Pokhrel and Gupta, 2010). None of these procedures consider the subgrid variability of the model parameters or geophysical characteristics.…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exemplify this kind of situation using a real world example, Figure 2 shows maps of the Neckar catchment in Germany, where GW-SW was intensively studied in integrated modelling projects (Barthel et al 2008a;Götzinger and Bardossy 2007;Götzinger et al 2008, see also section 3.3). It is obvious that in such a large heterogeneous catchment, various processes with strong interdependencies function at different spatial and temporal scales.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…& How should we deal with heterogeneity, how do we scale up processes, properties and model parameters (see, e.g. Bárdossy and Singh 2011;de Marsily et al 2005;Fleckenstein et al 2006;Götzinger and Bardossy 2007;McDonnell et al 2007;Noetinger et al 2005;Samaniego et al 2010;Vermeulen et al 2006)?…”
Section: Regional Integrated Modelling In View Of General Challenges mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such an approach toward modeling was mentioned by Götzinger and Bárdossy (2007), where they impose the Lipschitz and monotonic conditions to avoid the abrupt jump in soil moisture values for the neighboring cells of a distributed model based on the physical premises that such jumps are numerical artifacts and hydrologically unrealistic. Such kinds of information, which are not explicitly provided during model calibration, act as constraints to limit the feasible extent of the model parameter space, thus resulting in physically more meaningful model simulations.…”
Section: S Gharari Et Al: Constraint-based Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%