2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five protocols to extract DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues for the detection of human papillomavirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the anomaly is a likely consequence of one of the reasons why ∆Cq and DIN do not correlate as discussed above. Different kits have various efficiencies at removing inhibitors when purifying DNA from FFPE sections [23][24][25] , so the ExScale system might simply be less efficient at removing inhibitors than the QIAamp kit. We could not perform 260:280 and 260:230 purity analyses on ExScale-purified DNA because ExScale do not provide sufficient DNA elution buffer to blank the spectrophotometer (a significant disadvantage of ExScale in our view).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the anomaly is a likely consequence of one of the reasons why ∆Cq and DIN do not correlate as discussed above. Different kits have various efficiencies at removing inhibitors when purifying DNA from FFPE sections [23][24][25] , so the ExScale system might simply be less efficient at removing inhibitors than the QIAamp kit. We could not perform 260:280 and 260:230 purity analyses on ExScale-purified DNA because ExScale do not provide sufficient DNA elution buffer to blank the spectrophotometer (a significant disadvantage of ExScale in our view).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To monitor the quality of DNA extraction and to verify the presence of amplifiable DNA in our study, an endogenous DNA control gene HBB was quantified in FFPE and FF tissue (Fig1) [ 23 , 42 , 43 ]. Not surprisingly, the highest amount of HBB was found in the FF tissue, with Ct values of about 25 which indicates high amounts of high quality DNA as starting point for PCR amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 60.7% of study specimens were HNC from oral cavity or larynx, which are driven more by alcohol and smoking than HPV [4]. Furthermore, HPV prevalence rate in cervical cancer biopsies appear lower than that reported in other studies [16], suggesting possible low detection sensitivity due to the storage protocol of biopsy samples into paraffin, as mentioned elsewhere [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%