2014
DOI: 10.4103/0974-777x.138515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of etiological agents and resistance patterns of the pathogens causing community acquired and hospital acquired urinary tract infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The explanatory variables were demographic factors (age and gender), comorbidities measured by the Charlson morbidity index, 18 admission characteristics (urgent vs elective; and admitted from home vs from another facility), infection severity (defined as septic shock or severe sepsis), MDR profile (defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories 23 ), episode number and 30-day mortality. We categorised the source of infection using the following definitions: (1) UTI related to indwelling urinary catheterisation including long-term, short-term or intermittent catheterisation; (2) pyelonephritis, consisting of inflammation of the kidney tissue caused by bacterial infection in patients that have no other urinary tract modification; and (3) other sources, which includes UTI related to anatomical urinary tract modification, UTI related to obstructive uropathy and UTI related to other events that do not fulfil any other category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explanatory variables were demographic factors (age and gender), comorbidities measured by the Charlson morbidity index, 18 admission characteristics (urgent vs elective; and admitted from home vs from another facility), infection severity (defined as septic shock or severe sepsis), MDR profile (defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories 23 ), episode number and 30-day mortality. We categorised the source of infection using the following definitions: (1) UTI related to indwelling urinary catheterisation including long-term, short-term or intermittent catheterisation; (2) pyelonephritis, consisting of inflammation of the kidney tissue caused by bacterial infection in patients that have no other urinary tract modification; and (3) other sources, which includes UTI related to anatomical urinary tract modification, UTI related to obstructive uropathy and UTI related to other events that do not fulfil any other category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in accordance with a study done by Ahmed N et al (82%). (11) E. coli was the most frequently isolated pathogen (50.8%) followed by K. pneumoniae (26.7%) in our study. Shevade et al (2) has reported E. coli to be the most frequently isolated communityas well as hospital-acquired uropathogen (48.67%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Hanna-Wakim et al (13) in her study reports E. coli to be the most frequently isolated pathogen (79.4%) followed by K. pneumoniae (7.9%). Ahmed NH et al (11) Toval F. et al (14) and Tasbakan MI et al (15) also came to the finding that E. coli is the most frequently isolated uropathogen from community-and hospital-acquired UTI cases. All the 7 Gram-positive isolates were recovered from community-acquired cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Increased resistance to antibiotics has complicated the management of both of these outpatient infections. The spread of Enterobacteriaceae that carry a chromosomally mediated AmpC β-lactamase, an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), or a carbapenemase is becoming a significant concern in the community [ 8 11 ]. Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and β-hemolytic streptococci with tolerance to penicillin and resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones are increasing in Japan and extreme drug-resistant S. pneumoniae have been observed among multidrug-resistant isolates in Canada [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%