2016
DOI: 10.17344/acsi.2016.2451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ELISA, HPLC-FLD and HPLC-MS/MS Methods for Determination of Aflatoxin M1 in Natural Contaminated Milk Samples

Abstract: Presence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in milk should be continuously controlled in order to protect the population from risks associated with its proven toxicity and carcinogenicity. During recent years, there has been an increase in demand for development of sensitive, accurate, simple and fast method which is reliable for detection of AFM1 at low concentrations found in milk samples. For that purpose, enzyme linked immunosorbent asssay (ELISA), high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector (HPL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of concentrations <0.2 ppm is recommended with other HPLC instruments’ different detectors, i.e., HPLC with fluorescence detector. Although the theoretical detection limit was 3.5 × 10 −6 ppm, it must be analyzed by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to confirm [ 2 , 28 ]. As described on Protocol Cartagena that all about biologic products included mycotoxin must be clearly detected by instrument analysis with correlation between physic and chemistry of the compounds [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of concentrations <0.2 ppm is recommended with other HPLC instruments’ different detectors, i.e., HPLC with fluorescence detector. Although the theoretical detection limit was 3.5 × 10 −6 ppm, it must be analyzed by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to confirm [ 2 , 28 ]. As described on Protocol Cartagena that all about biologic products included mycotoxin must be clearly detected by instrument analysis with correlation between physic and chemistry of the compounds [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA methods have been validated in a wide variety of food matrices [7,75]. While ELISA can be performed in several ways such as direct assay, competitive direct assay, and competitive indirect assay, a competitive direct assay is most commonly used [103,104]. The principle of ELISA is based on the competitive interactions between mycotoxins (acting as an antigen) and assigned antibodies labelled with toxin-enzyme conjugate for many binding sites [76,105].…”
Section: Analysis Of Mycotoxins In Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, countermeasures may also include the application of various mycotoxin binding agents mixed with the feed (De Mil et al, 2015;Vila-Donat et al, 2018). Besides agricultural and technological approaches combating aflatoxins successfully, we also need to develop more sensitive and more reliable analytical methods (Kos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%