2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-002-0812-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of echo-enhanced ultrasound with fluoroscopic MCU for the detection of vesicoureteral reflux in neonates

Abstract: The role of echo-enhanced sonography is limited at present in our neonatal population as a screening examination. Its ability to detect cases of high-grade reflux may make it an attractive alternative in follow-up of known cases of VUR, and may help to reduce radiation exposure in this group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are studies using it in children as well [10 -13, 16, 17]. Comparative studies between VCUG and CES showed satisfactory results, with sensitivity between 70 % and 100 % and specificity between 86 % and 97 % [12,13,16,18]. The results of our study with sensitivity of 96 %, specificity of 94.8 % and negative predictive value of 99.2 % provide supportive evidence for the role of CES in the diagnosis of VUR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There are studies using it in children as well [10 -13, 16, 17]. Comparative studies between VCUG and CES showed satisfactory results, with sensitivity between 70 % and 100 % and specificity between 86 % and 97 % [12,13,16,18]. The results of our study with sensitivity of 96 %, specificity of 94.8 % and negative predictive value of 99.2 % provide supportive evidence for the role of CES in the diagnosis of VUR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The group from Heidelberg found excellent sensitivity (100%) of EEVUS compared with VCUG for detection of VUR when harmonic options were used [4,5]. Similar to us [3], McEwing et al [1] and Kenda et al [2] used only conventional US imaging and this was probably the reason for low sensitivity in the three studies. Although McEwing et al [1] performed urosonography in a cyclic manner, the sensitivity for VUR detection in their study was still low.…”
Section: Sirsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Similar to us [3], McEwing et al [1] and Kenda et al [2] used only conventional US imaging and this was probably the reason for low sensitivity in the three studies. Although McEwing et al [1] performed urosonography in a cyclic manner, the sensitivity for VUR detection in their study was still low. Recently, we recommenced investigation of children with UTI with EEVUS, using US devices with harmonic tissue imaging.…”
Section: Sirsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Echo-enhanced urosonography has been applied to monitor VUR, and it offers the advantages of nonionizing, real-time, and portable imaging capability [14]. However, echoenhanced urosonography is sensitive to high-grade reflux only [16]. Therefore, US imaging alone cannot be used for VUR tracking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%