2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of drying costs in biofuel drying between multi- stage and single-stage drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional active drying may incur significant energy and financial cost (Ragavhan et al 2005), and may lead to the release of harmful volatile compounds (Rupar and Sanati 2003). Hence the recurring interest for more effective techniques, such as multi-stage drying (Holmberg and Ahtila 2004), solar convection (Reuss et al 1997) and mechanical drying (Yoshida et al 2010). All try to make a less intense use of external inputs, to save on energy and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional active drying may incur significant energy and financial cost (Ragavhan et al 2005), and may lead to the release of harmful volatile compounds (Rupar and Sanati 2003). Hence the recurring interest for more effective techniques, such as multi-stage drying (Holmberg and Ahtila 2004), solar convection (Reuss et al 1997) and mechanical drying (Yoshida et al 2010). All try to make a less intense use of external inputs, to save on energy and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values also match with the zeolite specification. However, the values of drying rate and evaporation capacity by zeolite are above the values given in the literature and which range from 0.0005 to 0.0025 depending on type of dryer and product (see Arabhosseini, et al 2005;Mustafa et al, 2009, Holmberg and Ahtila, 2004, Baker et al, 2006and Temple, 2000. Figure 3 gives the measurements for the air at inlet (*) and outlet (o) of the adsorber.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Holmberg and P. Ahtila in [22,23] have compared the exergy efficiencies and the drying costs (capital and operational) of two types of drying systems: single-stage drying with partial recycle of spent air, and multi-stage drying. According to the results, the irreversibility production depends to a considerable extent on the heat source and the drying system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted from [15]. The model considers an average of the results of computing the dryer investment cost C INV,dryer [€] with two industrial dryer system cost functions with the related hypotheses, adapted from [15,21,23]:…”
Section: Economic Feasibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%