1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)33677-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dose–Response Curves with Subcutaneous and Intravenous Histamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of the procedure are given in a previous study (Desai, Zaveri & Antia, 1970a). Pepsin estimation was performed in each half-hour sample by the method of Hunt (Hunt, 1948) using plasma as substrate; the blue colour with Folin and Ciocalteu reagent was measured on a colorimeter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the procedure are given in a previous study (Desai, Zaveri & Antia, 1970a). Pepsin estimation was performed in each half-hour sample by the method of Hunt (Hunt, 1948) using plasma as substrate; the blue colour with Folin and Ciocalteu reagent was measured on a colorimeter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHT were performed as described in a previous study (Desai, Zaveri & Antia, 1970). Maximal acid output (MAO) (0-60 min) was calculated by the method of Card & Marks (1960).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose-response curves to 2-0, 2-4, 2-8, and 3-2 mg of histamine acid phosphate subcutaneously; to 2-0, 2-4, and 2-8 mg/hr of histamine acid phospate intravenously (Desai, Zaveri and Antia 1970a); to 75, 100, and 125 mg of ametazole hydrocloride (Histalog) subcutaneously (Desai, Zaveri, and Antia, 1970b); and to 250, 300, and 350 ,tg of pentagastrin subcutaneously (Desai, Zaveri, and Antia, 1971) were obtained on different days, as described in previous studies. The dose-response curves for any one stimulus were completed within three weeks, but different stimuli were administered at various times according to the availability of the stimu!us or the convenience of the patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%