2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dislocation density based approaches for prediction of defect structure evolution in aluminium and copper processed by ECAP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant difference between the dislocation density due to the size effect (2.36 × 10 15 m −2 ) and the dislocation density due to lattice microstrain (1.19 × 10 13 m −2 ) is connected with the energy balance. As it was demonstrated in the works [28,31], a comparison of the energy of the dislocation groups uniformly distributed with respect to the volume with the energy of the dislocation in the walls of the dislocation cells clearly shows that with a specific dislocation energy, it is more advantageous energy-wise to create cells instead of maintaining a uniform distribution. This relation, regardless of the applied treatment temperature, is proven for each of the analyzed samples.…”
Section: High Temperature X-ray Diffraction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant difference between the dislocation density due to the size effect (2.36 × 10 15 m −2 ) and the dislocation density due to lattice microstrain (1.19 × 10 13 m −2 ) is connected with the energy balance. As it was demonstrated in the works [28,31], a comparison of the energy of the dislocation groups uniformly distributed with respect to the volume with the energy of the dislocation in the walls of the dislocation cells clearly shows that with a specific dislocation energy, it is more advantageous energy-wise to create cells instead of maintaining a uniform distribution. This relation, regardless of the applied treatment temperature, is proven for each of the analyzed samples.…”
Section: High Temperature X-ray Diffraction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The sample after plastic treatment in state T3 characterizes in the average crystallite size (35 nm) and the average dislocation density 5.30 × 10 14 m -2 . The development of the substructure and the increase of the dislocation density in aluminum processed with the use of severe plastic deformation depends on the stress, which has been discussed in the study [28]. In addition, the agglomeration of point defects in the supersaturated solution intensifies the process of subgrain formation during the plastic treatment [29,30].…”
Section: High Temperature X-ray Diffraction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the geomagnetic environment, the magnetic field H σ generated by the stress can be equal to the applied external magnetic field when the material is subjected to external stress, which can be expressed as [22]:…”
Section: Numerical Model Of Non-uniform Crack Magnetic Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During continuous dynamic recrystallization, the strain-induced low-angle boundaries gradually transform into high-angle boundaries with an increase in the total strain. As a result, the ultrafine-grained structure with high dislocation density evolves at large strain levels [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%