2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of disinfection effect of pressurized gases of CO2, N2O, and N2 on Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). These findings are in accordance with those of a previous study (Vo et al, 2013); therefore, an operating pressure of 0.7 MPa was used for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Inactivation Effect Against T4 And Ms2supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). These findings are in accordance with those of a previous study (Vo et al, 2013); therefore, an operating pressure of 0.7 MPa was used for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Inactivation Effect Against T4 And Ms2supporting
confidence: 90%
“…N 2 O was chosen since both N 2 O and CO 2 have analogous properties. The only distinction is that CO 2 lowers the pH in water but N 2 O does not (Vo et al, 2013). For the third disinfectant, neither CO 2 nor N 2 O was used, instead compressed air (from atmosphere) at 0.7 MPa was prepared for disinfection.…”
Section: Inactivation Mechanism Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors concluded that decompression rate is an important factor in inactivation due to the expansion of CO 2 into the cells (Fraser, 1951;Lin et al, 1992aLin et al, , 1992bKumugai et al, 1997;Cheng et al, 2011), while others found that it had no significant effect on bacterial inhibition and that mechanical cell bursting did not take place (Li et al, 2013;Debs-Louka et al, 1999;Nakamura et al, 1994;Vo et al, 2013a). Enomoto et al (1997b) found that explosive depressurization with pressures over 4 MPa had a strong effect on inhibition, but not at less than 4 MPa.…”
Section: Treatment Time Pressure Cycling Microbial Type Depressurimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ease of CO 2 movement does not cause differences in pH on the two sides of the cell membrane. Another factor of high pressure CO 2 , cellular lipid extraction, leads to the surface of cell membrane changing and collapsing (Li et al, 2013;Vo et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Membrane Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, pressurized CO 2 has shown great potential as a sustainable disinfection technology in water and wastewater treatment applications [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] largely because this method does not generate DBPs [9,22]. Kobayashi et al [16,17] employed CO 2 microbubbles in the treatment of drinking water and succeeded in inhibiting Escherichia coli within 13.3 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%